Bauke Jan Douma wrote:
> What might have been the case here, and which is a
> situation that I find myself in sometimes, is this:
> you want to do 'filter1 FILE | filter2'
> (or 'filter1 isn't what's to be expected. You investigate, and
> part of that is temporarily substituting filter1 for
> pla
Ondřej Vašík <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, hopefully fixed your objections from that mail and from the
> discussion off the list, patch is in attachement.
Thank you!
I've made a few name changes by transforming the patch before
applying it, so that the function name and file name match, and
so
Andreas Schwab wrote on 10-03-08 19:54:
Damien ANCELIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I met a problem with the sort command : I've used the uniq command with
the -c option to count some numbers, and then applying sort -n don't sort
lines by numeric order of the first field.
Here is an example (my
Damien ANCELIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I met a problem with the sort command : I've used the uniq command with
> the -c option to count some numbers, and then applying sort -n don't sort
> lines by numeric order of the first field.
> Here is an example (my sort version is 5.97) :
> $ cat bug
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008, Damien ANCELIN wrote:
I met a problem with the sort command : I've used the uniq command with the -c
option to count some numbers, and then applying sort -n don't sort lines by
numeric order of the first field.
Here is an example (my sort version is 5.97) :
$ cat bug_sort
Hello,
I met a problem with the sort command : I've used the uniq command with
the -c option to count some numbers, and then applying sort -n don't
sort lines by numeric order of the first field.
Here is an example (my sort version is 5.97) :
$ cat bug_sort | sort -n
1320 51970
1692 12345
Jim Meyering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> This is relatively
> low priority, since very few people care about systems configured to
> allow regular users to use chown. If you don't hear back
> from someone
> after a couple weeks, please ping the mailing list. ]
>
I agree. Otherw
Jim Meyering wrote:
> ...
> So you'll have to make the three .c files include the new .h,
> and you'll have to adjust src/Makefile.am to link the new .c
> file to each of those three programs.
> ...
> Then, create the file "patch" like this:
>
> git format-patch --stdout --signoff HEAD~1 > pat
"PHILIPP, Axel, Dr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jim Meyering [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> This is relatively
>> low priority, since very few people care about systems configured to
>> allow regular users to use chown. If you don't hear back
>> from someone
>> after a couple week
Pádraig Brady wrote:
> find / -xdev -printf "%p%y\n" |
> sed 's/d$/\//;t; s/.$//;' |
> tr '\n' '\0' |
> xargs -r0 du -s |
> LC_ALL=C sort -rn -k1,1
Note that will give the output you want but will be very inefficient :(
So Jim's method is the best compromise for the moment.
Pádraig.
___
Thomas Guettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> I'm very dubious about adding this as an option.
>>> Do you really think an option is warranted for this,
>>> considering you can already get the desired behavior
>>> with a small wrapper, as I demonstrated:
>>
>> The wrapper is awkward, but it's bette
>> I'm very dubious about adding this as an option.
>> Do you really think an option is warranted for this,
>> considering you can already get the desired behavior
>> with a small wrapper, as I demonstrated:
>>
>
> The wrapper is awkward, but it's better than a new option.
>
> So probably bes
Pádraig Brady schrieb:
> Thomas Guettler wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I use "du -ax / | sort -rn > /var/tmp/du-`date --iso`" to get the sorted
>> total size of all
>> files and directories.
>>
>> Unfortunately you can't see a difference between a directory and a file
>> in the output. It would be nice
Thomas Guettler wrote:
>>> I'm very dubious about adding this as an option.
>>> Do you really think an option is warranted for this,
>>> considering you can already get the desired behavior
>>> with a small wrapper, as I demonstrated:
>>>
>> The wrapper is awkward, but it's better than a new o
Jim Meyering wrote:
> Pádraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Thomas Guettler wrote:
>>> Thank you for being interested. I wrote a patch which makes the slash
>>> optional:
>>>
>>> src/du --help:
>>> ...
>>> -z, --dir-with-slash append a slash to directories.
>> I don't think it's worth an
Pádraig Brady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Guettler wrote:
>> Thank you for being interested. I wrote a patch which makes the slash
>> optional:
>>
>> src/du --help:
>> ...
>> -z, --dir-with-slash append a slash to directories.
>
> I don't think it's worth an option TBH.
> How about we d
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #22505 (project coreutils):
Regarding nss_ldap, I guess that this was a bug in nss_ldap it was setting
errno explicitly to ENOENT. That problem should be fixed with the latest
nss_ldap release (260).
Probably the NSS module handling nisplus has the same problem.
__
Thomas Guettler wrote:
> Pádraig Brady schrieb:
>> Thomas Guettler wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I use "du -ax / | sort -rn > /var/tmp/du-`date --iso`" to get the sorted
>>> total size of all
>>> files and directories.
>>>
>>> Unfortunately you can't see a difference between a directory and a file
>
18 matches
Mail list logo
