Sam Sirlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks very much for coreutils. 5.95 builds fine, however 5.96 does
> not. Note that runing autoconf solves the problem (configure again,
> make now works, though the color ls test fails...).
>
> On solaris sparc,
>
> (before running autoconf)
> ...
> config.
Thanks very much for coreutils. 5.95 builds fine, however 5.96 does
not. Note that runing autoconf solves the problem (configure again,
make now works, though the color ls test fails...).
On solaris sparc,
(before running autoconf)
...
config.status: executing depfiles commands
./config.status
>> Thanks for testing it. I installed that patch (enclosed again below)
>> into gnulib and the coreutils CVS trunk. Jim, is it OK if I also
>> install this into the coreutils b5_9x branch?
>
> Yes. Thanks for dealing with that.
OK, done.
___
Bug-cor
Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Classpath issues should goto the classpath project and not to GCC.
The classpath project fixed that portability bug long ago.
I just checked, and it was fixed in classpath 0.07, released in 2003.
The classpath developers didn't have to do any special wo
On Thu, May 25, 2006 at 09:13:36PM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> For ltmain.sh and libjava/classpath/ltmain.sh the patch is merely
> propagating fixes that I contributed quite some time ago to Libtool.
> These fixes have been distributed and exercised extensively on many
> platforms. (I am a bit sur
