Hi Phillip,
Thanks for information.
While upgrading software (without reboot): this design technique is really
good.
But I've a doubt:-
When we purchase License of a software/tool, after expiry date: License
Files
1. are deleted, OR
2. are modified so that they can't be
On Mon, Nov 21, 2005 at 10:56:16AM -0800, Mahesh Fernando wrote:
> Dear friends,
>
> I am using Windows service for unix 3.5. When I user the sort utility to
> sort numerically for specific field it gives me error Input file specified
> two times.. I think it is a bug.
I'm pretty sure
Mahesh Fernando wrote:
> I am using Windows service for unix 3.5. When I user the sort utility to
> sort numerically for specific field it gives me error Input file specified
> two times.. I think it is a bug.
> My command format as follows,
>
> sort +23n file_name
> sort utility v
Dear friends,
I am using Windows service for unix 3.5. When I user the sort utility to sort
numerically for specific field it gives me error Input file specified two
times.. I think it is a bug.
My command format as follows,
sort +23n file_name
sort utility version 2.0.21
Yes, -qlanglvl=extc89 fixes it so we are good to go. Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: Paul Eggert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2005 2:49 PM
To: Lemley James - jlemle
Cc: bug-coreutils@gnu.org
Subject: Re: FW: PMR 52061,370,000
"Lemley James - jlemle" <[EMAIL PROT
od - --version = 2.0 written by Jim Meyering.
uname -a = Linux linux 2.4.29-rc1 #1 SMP Tue Jan 11 16:53:32 EST 2005 i686
unknown unknown GNU/Linux
Jack
-Original Message-
From: Eric Blake [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Fri 11/18/2005 4:03 PM
To: Van
"Lemley James - jlemle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I lost in my argument that they should do something about it; they are
> clearly not going to.
Thanks for trying.
Does -qlanglvl=extc99 and/or -qlanglvl=extc89 fix the problem?
If so, we're done, since my installed-on-Friday patch will use th
Paul Eggert writes:
> The basic idea
> here is that coreutils will attempt to detect the problem, and pass
> the -qlanglvl=extc89 option to IBM's compiler. (It will pass
> -qlanglvl=ansi to older versions of IBM's compilers.) I assume this
> will work around the problem; if not, please let me kno
On Mon, 21 Nov 2005, kuldeep vyas wrote:
I'm using Redhat 9 (kernel 2.4.20-8 on i686)
I logged in as k(username), then I started terminal, &
then I gave following commands:-
[snip]
k>ls /home/k/
// my_dir gone
k>pwd
/home/k/my_dir
// oops!!
It's likely here that "pwd" is the shell's buil
It is a general design philosophy of linux, and unix in general, that
the kernel will not enforce locking of files. This is why you can
upgrade software without rebooting: the old file can be deleted and
replaced with the new file, even though it is still in use. Of course,
it isn't actually
kuldeep vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> k>pwd
> /home/k/my_dir
> // oops!!
Try /bin/pwd.
> pwd says I'm in my_dir, but my_dir doesn't exist.
It does, it just doesn't have a name any more.
> I think: user should not be allowed to remove a directory,
> until & unless he is placed in a direc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
According to kuldeep vyas on 11/21/2005 4:42 AM:
> Hi,
>
> I'm using Redhat 9 (kernel 2.4.20-8 on i686)
> I logged in as k(username), then I started terminal, &
> then I gave following commands:-
>
> k>pwd
> /home/k
>
> k>mkdir my_dir
> // i creat
[input][input][input][input]
Hi,
I'm using Redhat 9 (kernel 2.4.20-8 on i686)
I logged in as k(username), then I started terminal, &
then I gave following commands:-
k>pwd
/home/k
k>mkdir my_dir
// i created a directory: my_dir
k>cd my_dir
//
13 matches
Mail list logo