Re: base64 tool?

2004-12-21 Thread Philip Rowlands
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Simon Josefsson wrote: >I was looking for something simpler, preferably the tool should even be >called 'base64' so TAB completion works. Perhaps base64 is not yet as >widely used to motivate it being part of coreutils, though. Just >because I often need such a tool doesn't

Re: base64 tool?

2004-12-21 Thread Simon Josefsson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Simon Josefsson wrote: >> Is a base64 encode/decode tool suitable for coreutils? >> I typically use `M-: (base64-encode-string "foo")' in Emacs, but I >> have found I often want a command line tool as well. And `echo >> foo|base64' is easier to type. >> There is a base

Re: base64 tool?

2004-12-21 Thread Jim Meyering
> Is a base64 encode/decode tool suitable for coreutils? As Padraig noted, GNU recode does this: $ echo foo|recode ../64 Zm9vCg== $ echo foo|recode ../64|recode /64 foo but I find the syntax to be obscure. And it's not always available. ___ B

Re: base64 tool?

2004-12-21 Thread James Youngman
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 12:25:56PM +0100, Simon Josefsson wrote: > I'm thinking: > > Usage: base64 [OPTION] [FILE]... > Encode binary data using printable characters. > With no FILE, or when FILE is -, read standard input. Alternatively, we could use a two-line Perl script with MIME::Decoder. J

Re: base64 tool?

2004-12-21 Thread P
Simon Josefsson wrote: Is a base64 encode/decode tool suitable for coreutils? I typically use `M-: (base64-encode-string "foo")' in Emacs, but I have found I often want a command line tool as well. And `echo foo|base64' is easier to type. There is a base64 module in gnulib that I think would be su

base64 tool?

2004-12-21 Thread Simon Josefsson
Is a base64 encode/decode tool suitable for coreutils? I typically use `M-: (base64-encode-string "foo")' in Emacs, but I have found I often want a command line tool as well. And `echo foo|base64' is easier to type. There is a base64 module in gnulib that I think would be suitable for this. It

Re: [bug-gnulib] Re: getdate don't need alloca

2004-12-21 Thread Bruno Haible
Paul Eggert wrote: > A couple of other things. The Bison documentation says that > YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA must be defined to 0 if it is defined to anything. But then the second to fourth line of the following bison output are useless. # ifdef YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA # if YYSTACK_USE_ALLOCA # define YY

Re: Bug#286605: csplit help and manual page uses misleading file names

2004-12-21 Thread Jim Meyering
Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: coreutils > Version: 5.2.1-2 > > $ csplit --help | head -3 > Usage: csplit [OPTION]... FILE PATTERN... > Output pieces of FILE separated by PATTERN(s) to files `xx01', `xx02', ..., > and output byte counts of each piece to standard output. > > Wh