[Bug binutils/31527] gdb is not working for UNC path

2024-04-08 Thread simon.cook at embecosm dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31527 Simon Cook changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simon.cook at embecosm dot com

[Bug binutils/31527] gdb is not working for UNC path

2024-04-09 Thread simon.cook at embecosm dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31527 --- Comment #8 from Simon Cook --- The definition is there (I have the header file), this was a linking issue (and to confirm we are using the same tools to build). I've looked through the Makefile/config.status files for my build, and what s

[Bug binutils/31527] gdb is not working for UNC path

2024-04-11 Thread simon.cook at embecosm dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31527 --- Comment #12 from Simon Cook --- Created attachment 15460 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15460&action=edit Patch to fix issue without pulling in shlwapi Patch with my suggested change, and done some testing pre-the

[Bug binutils/31527] gdb is not working for UNC path

2024-04-15 Thread simon.cook at embecosm dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31527 Simon Cook changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #15460|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/31527] gdb is not working for UNC path

2024-04-16 Thread simon.cook at embecosm dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31527 --- Comment #18 from Simon Cook --- Created attachment 15466 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15466&action=edit Remove debug output Oh drat, I missed that when I was scanning the final patch before submitting (scanned f