[Bug gprofng/32166] gprofng testsuite uses non-portable which

|--- |2.44 Status|NEW |RESOLVED Assignee|vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot c |sam at gentoo dot org |om | --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- Fixed for 2.44. -- You are receiving this mail because

[Bug gprofng/32166] gprofng testsuite uses non-portable which

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32166 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot c

[Bug gas/27472] gas: Suppress "CFI instruction used without previous .cfi_startproc" if .cfi_sections is empty

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27472 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/28893] binutils-2.37: PGO build with Clang results in configure error: AR with --plugin and rc is required for LTO build

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28893 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org

[Bug ld/29226] gcc -fcf-protection option causes GCC 12 gccgo build to fail : "failed to match split-stack sequence"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29226 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/29235] Some glibc tests crash in DT_RELR relocation on powerpc64le

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29235 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/13038] ld access out-of-bounds memory on HPPA64

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13038 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/29310] [2.39 Regression] copy relocation against non-copyable protected symbol `__cxa_ pure_virtual' on aarch64-linux-gnu

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29310 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug gold/13764] gold doesn't take the LD_RUN_PATH environment variable into account

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13764 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/12291] "ld -r" doesn't work with mixed IR/non-IR objects

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12291 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/12291] "ld -r" doesn't work with mixed IR/non-IR objects

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12291 --- Comment #9 from Sam James --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #7) > > Hi H.J. > > > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > > > > > Here is the proposal: > > > > > It has been moved at: >

[Bug binutils/29397] binutils: support zstd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29397 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug gas/29401] New: Hang when compiling large printf() file (from glibc's tst-printf-bz18872) on HPPA with -ggdb3

tatus: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sam at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 14228 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14228&act

[Bug gas/29401] Hang when compiling large printf() file (from glibc's tst-printf-bz18872) on HPPA with -ggdb3

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29401 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Host||hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu

[Bug gas/29401] Hang when compiling large printf() file (from glibc's tst-printf-bz18872) on HPPA with -ggdb3

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29401 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug gas/29401] Hang when compiling large printf() file (from glibc's tst-printf-bz18872) on HPPA with -ggdb3

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29401 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #1) > Versions: > - gcc (Gentoo 11.2.1_p20220115 p4) 11.2.1 20220115 > - GNU ld (Gentoo 2.37_p1 p2) 2.37 > - kernel 5.19.0-rc4 I can also hit it with gcc (Gentoo 11.3.0 p4)

[Bug gas/29401] Hang in `as` when compiling large printf() file (from glibc's tst-printf-bz18872) on HPPA with -ggdb3

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29401 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Hang when compiling large |Hang in `as` when compiling

[Bug gas/25333] GAS is slow processing units compiled with -fdebug-types-sections containing many types

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25333 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug gas/29401] Hang in `as` when compiling large printf() file (from glibc's tst-printf-bz18872) on HPPA with -ggdb3

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29401 --- Comment #4 from Sam James --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #3) > (In reply to Sam James from comment #0) > > It hangs at the end invoking `as`. > > Then you should attach the .s file. Originally, I didn't get a .s because I was u

[Bug gas/29401] Hang in `as` when compiling large printf() file (from glibc's tst-printf-bz18872) on HPPA with -ggdb3

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29401 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- Created attachment 14229 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14229&action=edit ccuAnphe.s -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/29401] Hang in `as` when compiling large printf() file (from glibc's tst-printf-bz18872) on HPPA with -ggdb3

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29401 --- Comment #7 from Sam James --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #6) > > So I guess the issue is actually GCC? > Yes, clearly. Yeah, I see it now. Apologies. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/29401] Hang in `as` when compiling large printf() file (from glibc's tst-printf-bz18872) on HPPA with -ggdb3

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29401 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug binutils/29457] Consider making --disassembler-color=color default if terminal

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29457 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug gas/29451] gas-2.39 started adding 0-sized DIEs to functions without .size

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29451 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug gprofng/29477] Build failure on musl: collector_module.h:78:13: error: duplicate member ‘pwrite’

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29477 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug gprofng/29479] Collection fails when built without java support: symbol lookup error: ...-binutils-2.39/bin/../lib/gprofng/libgp-collector.so: undefined symbol: __collector_jprofile_start_attach

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29479 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug gas/29487] all/gas.exp test failure (new in 2.39): FAIL: .equ redefinitions (3)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29487 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug gprofng/29521] man pages are not in the release tarball

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29521 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug gprofng/29477] Build failure on musl: collector_module.h:78:13: error: duplicate member ‘pwrite’

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29477 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- You can also try, per #musl on IRC's recommendations, http://musl.cc/ which is designed for this sort of thing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/27226] ld.bfd contains huge .rodata section

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27226 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/29592] [2.39 Regression][bisected] Exec stack warning causes go programs with cgo to fail to link on mips

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29592 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/28812] ld: Make --compress-debug-sections=zlib parallel

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28812 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/29592] [2.39 Regression][bisected] Exec stack warning causes go programs with cgo to fail to link on mips

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29592 --- Comment #10 from Sam James --- wrt the configure flag issue: could we change this so it only affects arches which support non-exec stacks, etc? i.e. If there's an exception granted to disable the warning by default, don't override it with

[Bug binutils/14243] software that includes bfd.h fails to build with "#error config.h must be included before this header"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14243 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/29764] objdump confused with --enable-targets=all if several machines include the same cpu name

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29764 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/13256] AR + plugin fails with "no operation specified" error

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13256 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/29843] binutils-2.39 ld test failures "ld-aarch64/tls-relax-gdesc-le-now", "BTI PLT with only GNU PROP"

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29843 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/29939] -z pack-relative-relocs --no-keep-memory -pie tries to write a yet-to-be-loaded section content

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29939 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/24784] elf_x86_64_check_tls_transition should allow R_X86_64_GOTPCREL (-fno-plt)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24784 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/25694] R_RISCV_TPREL_HI20 relocations cause riscv64 to add TEXTREL bit on executables

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25694 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug gprofng/29521] [docs] man pages are not in the release tarball

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29521 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- Could this be addressed in time for .40 if possible please? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30002] New: pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu

: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sam at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Host: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu Target: sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu Build: sparc64-unknown-linux

[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- >From ld.log: ``` gcc -B/home/buildbot-sw/builder/workerdir/binutils-gentoo-sparc/binutils-build/ld/tmpdir/ld/ -L/usr/local/sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib64 -L/usr/local/lib64 -L/lib64 -L/usr/lib64 -L/usr/loc

[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- Created attachment 14597 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14597&action=edit ld.log.xz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.gentoo.org/sho

[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/26391] Question regarding duplicate symbols

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.d

[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu since 496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c475664f2b73bd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld |pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld

[Bug ld/26391] Question regarding duplicate symbols

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/26236] ld on sparc produces R_SPARC_NONE relocations

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26236 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu since 496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c475664f2b73bd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4) > I couldn't reproduce it on GCC compiler farm last time. The Linux/sparc64 > machine on GCC compiler farm was down. I can give you access to this environment if you ema

[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu since 496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c475664f2b73bd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 --- Comment #11 from Sam James --- Thanks H.J., this works! === ld Summary === # of expected passes1598 # of expected failures 26 # of untested testcases 1 # of unsupported tests 157 What

[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu since 496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c475664f2b73bd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 --- Comment #12 from Sam James --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #11) > Thanks H.J., this works! > > === ld Summary === > # of expected passes 1598 > # of expected failures26 > # of untested testca

[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu since 496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c475664f2b73bd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 --- Comment #15 from Sam James --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13) > Created attachment 14602 [details] > Try this one This looks to have worked! The failures for binutils-try-debian-i386 / binutils-try-fedora-arm64 / binutils-try-fedo

[Bug ld/26236] ld on sparc produces R_SPARC_NONE relocations

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26236 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|https://sourceware.org/bugz | |illa/show_bug.cgi?id=

[Bug binutils/30022] concurrent builds can fail

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30022 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org --- Comment #1

[Bug gprofng/30043] libgprofng.so.* are installed to a wrong location

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30043 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug gprofng/28972] gprofng libraries should be installed under $(pkglibdir)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28972 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug gprofng/28972] gprofng libraries should be installed under $(pkglibdir)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28972 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug gprofng/30043] libgprofng.so.* are installed to a wrong location

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30043 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug gprofng/30036] Build failure on aarch64 w/ glibc: symbol `pwrite64' is already defined

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30036 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30091] Bundle all artifacts and command line invocation to quickly reproduce linker errors

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30091 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug libctf/27305] relinking libctf during install does not find libbfd

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27305 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/29042] opcodes libtool regression

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29042 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug libctf/28545] cross compile incorrectly using host libraries in install relink

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28545 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/29042] opcodes libtool regression

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29042 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug libctf/27360] libctf.so.0: undefined symbol: bsearch_r

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27360 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug binutils/29042] opcodes libtool regression

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29042 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- I suspect this is the same as an issue we've been hitting in Gentoo (https://bugs.gentoo.org/834720) which is mostly noticeable if built the previous system copy of binutils with --enable-pgo=lto (or otherwise

[Bug binutils/29042] opcodes libtool regression (relinks libopcodes during install, picks up wrong libiberty from system)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29042 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|opcodes libtool regression |opcodes libtool regression

[Bug binutils/29042] [2.38 regression] opcodes libtool regression (relinks libopcodes during install, picks up wrong libiberty from system)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29042 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|opcodes libtool regression |[2.38 regression] opcodes

[Bug gold/23856] Executables linked with gold against musl segfault at startup

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23856 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30078] FAIL: merge4

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30078 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/25491] binutils 2.34 tarball requires makeinfo

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25491 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug binutils/28909] 2.38 tarball (once again) requires makeinfo

||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=25491 CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/29042] [2.38 regression] opcodes libtool regression (relinks libopcodes during install, picks up wrong libiberty from system)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29042 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-03-01 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug binutils/30237] New: strip fails on riscv with 'not enough room for program headers, stgnjAlO[.interp]: bad value'

Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sam at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Reporting this on behalf of psykose from Alpine. binutils's riscv strip fail

[Bug binutils/30281] error: multiple definition of `pwrite@GLIBC_2.2' with LTO and symver attribute

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30281 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/29042] [2.38 regression] opcodes libtool regression (relinks libopcodes during install, picks up wrong libiberty from system)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29042 --- Comment #8 from Sam James --- See also https://inbox.sourceware.org/binutils/20230228224937.3832887-1-dilfri...@gentoo.org/. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/28824] relro security issues

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28824 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30358] New: bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox

ent: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: sam at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- bfd seems to take > 4 minutes to link busybox-1.35.0 on my machine (AMD 3590X w/ an nvme disk, 64GB RAM), while lld takes 2 seconds. It seems to peak at around 780

[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- If I run 'perf record ...' (... = command above), I get this from 'perf report': # Event count (approx.): 543334586 # # Overhead Command Shared Object Symbol # .

[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #1) > (Tarball with files coming.) This contains the object files, command used, and perf.data: https://dev.gentoo.org/~sam/bugs/sourceware/30358/busybox-hangs.tar.xz --

[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 --- Comment #3 from Sam James --- Created attachment 14829 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14829&action=edit ps faux output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 --- Comment #4 from Sam James --- To get the hang `-Wl,--sort-section,alignment` is sufficient: ``` x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -static -o busybox_unstripped -Wl,--sort-section,alignment -Wl,--start-group applets/built-in.o archival/lib.a archival

[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox with -Wl,--sort-section,alignment

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) |bfd very slow (> 4 minutes)

[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox with -Wl,--sort-section,alignment

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #4) > To get the hang `-Wl,--sort-section,alignment` is sufficient: > ``` Happens with -Wl,--sort-section,name too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the

[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox with -Wl,--sort-section,alignment

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 --- Comment #6 from Sam James --- If I attach gdb after it's been running for a while: ``` 0x55af4c8e93c1 in compare_section (bsec=, asec=, sort=) at ../bfd/bfd.h:1115 1115 return sec->name; (gdb) bt #0 0x55af4c8e93c1 in compare_

[Bug ld/30300] LTO drops entry point symbol

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30300 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/15516] GNU LD is confused when linker plugin turns COMDAT symbol into static w/o renaming.

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15516 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug gprofng/30360] [gprofng collect] Seg. Fault when application uses std::thread

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30360 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox with -Wl,--sort-section,alignment (regression in binutils-2.40)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) |bfd very slow (> 4 minutes)

[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox with -Wl,--sort-section,alignment (regression in binutils-2.40)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||matz at suse dot de --- Comment #8 from S

[Bug ld/30367] Performance regression after updating to 2.40

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30367 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox with -Wl,--sort-section,alignment (regression in binutils-2.40)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/30367] Performance regression after updating to 2.40

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30367 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are

[Bug ld/30358] bfd very slow (> 4 minutes) to link busybox with -Wl,--sort-section,alignment (regression in binutils-2.40)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30358 --- Comment #9 from Sam James --- The patch for bug 30367 (https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2023-April/127120.html) unfortunately doesn't help. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/30294] Infinite recursion expanding macro

|RESOLVED CC||sam at gentoo dot org --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- I'll include this comment in the other bug. Thank you for the neat reproducer & bisect. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 30292 *** --

[Bug gas/30292] Unbounded recursion/infinite loop in eqv expansion

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30292 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- *** Bug 30294 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/30292] Unbounded recursion/infinite loop in eqv expansion since 4faaa10f3fabb345aca006ed67a8be97dc924e9c

||jbeulich at suse dot com, ||sam at gentoo dot org --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- Potuz has analysed this in a dupe (PR30294): (In reply to Potuz from comment #0) > The [hashtree](https://github.com/prysmaticlabs/hashtree) fails to comp

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >