[Bug gas/994] New: section switch in function causes segfault

2005-06-07 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC target triplet: ia64-linux http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=994 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are w

[Bug gas/994] section switch in function causes segfault

2005-06-08 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-08 20:19 --- Yes, your warning solution is acceptable. I may look into disabling the section switching stuff for ia64. I'm unconvinced it's worth the effort it would take to get all the unwind info correct

[Bug gas/1434] IA64 assembler generates different debug info

2005-10-07 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-07 08:54 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 1433 *** -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug gas/1433] IA64 assembler generates bad 2.6.9 Linux kernel.

2005-10-07 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-10-07 08:54 --- *** Bug 1434 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1433 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug

[Bug ld/10955] New: Invalid LTOFF22X -> GPREL22 relaxation

2009-11-13 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
ity: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC target triplet: ia64-linux http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10955 --- You are receiv

[Bug ld/10956] New: Missing --no-relax option

2009-11-13 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC target triplet: ia64-* http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10956 --- You are receiving

[Bug ld/10957] New: Missing option to really print section+offset

2009-11-13 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
ity: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10957 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on t

[Bug ld/10961] New: Map file generated too late

2009-11-14 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org

[Bug ld/10955] Invalid LTOFF22X -> GPREL22 relaxation

2009-11-14 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-14 18:01 --- On second thought, rather than make you dig through the gcc pr, I've put a complete test case at http://are.twiddle.net/~rth/binu-pr-10955.o.xz Even with compression the test case is 3 times too big to a

[Bug ld/10956] Missing --no-relax option

2009-11-24 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-24 16:17 --- - bfd_boolean relax; + signed int disable_target_specific_optimizations; Why rename it to "target_specific_optimizations"? It's still relaxation. I do like the macros though. You could st

[Bug ld/11891] linker changes target register in tlsgd load

2010-08-06 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org |redhat dot com | Status|NEW

[Bug ld/11891] linker changes target register in tlsgd load

2010-08-09 Thread rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
p;r1=1.5100&r2=1.5101 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elf64-alpha.c.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.168&r2=1.169 --- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-10 00:02 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed