[Bug binutils/20177] New: ld ignores --with-lib-path and -L for indirectly loaded libraries

2016-05-30 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: romain.geissler at amadeus dot com Target Milestone: --- Hi, I am wondering what is the expected behavior of ld when a library is implicitly loaded. What should be the

[Bug binutils/30082] New: ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp should use LDFLAGS not CFLAGS

2023-02-05 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: romain.geissler at amadeus dot com Target Milestone: --- Hi, I have a new test failure when moving from binutils 2.39 to 2.40, all the bootstap tests fail. Checking the

[Bug binutils/30082] ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp should use LDFLAGS not CFLAGS

2023-02-05 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30082 --- Comment #1 from Romain Geissler --- Patch posted here: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2023-February/125912.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/30082] ld-bootstrap/bootstrap.exp should use LDFLAGS not CFLAGS

2023-02-07 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30082 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/21841] FAIL: debug_msg.sh with GCC 7

2017-09-26 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21841 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com

[Bug gold/21841] FAIL: debug_msg.sh with GCC 7

2017-09-27 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21841 --- Comment #2 from Romain Geissler --- Created attachment 10491 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10491&action=edit Possible workaround in the gold testsuite (not a nice one...) -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug ld/22758] FAIL: Run pr22393-2

2018-02-14 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22758 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com

[Bug gold/23620] New: [gold] Support jobserver with --threads

2018-09-09 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
Component: gold Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com Reporter: romain.geissler at amadeus dot com CC: ian at airs dot com Target Milestone: --- Hi, The current gold implementation tries to create by default as many threads as the number of inputs, which can lead on

[Bug ld/23499] Incorrect code in bfd_elf_record_link_assignment

2018-09-12 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23499 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com

[Bug gas/23645] New: Backport as .st_ino/.st_dev check to check input and output are different

2018-09-13 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: romain.geissler at amadeus dot com Target Milestone: --- Hi, Recently the commit: commit 2a50366ded329bfb39d387253450c9d5302c3503 Author: Robert Yang Date: Tue

[Bug ld/23818] Symbols from discarded section in IR object leaked into final executable

2018-10-24 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23818 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com

[Bug ld/23818] Symbols from discarded section in IR object leaked into final executable

2018-10-24 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23818 --- Comment #3 from Romain Geissler --- Thanks, I will check that this indeed fixes my case with libssh2. I understand this problem is not really wide and might actually affect just me since I don't expect that using -ffat-lto-objects is very

[Bug ld/23818] Symbols from discarded section in IR object leaked into final executable

2018-10-26 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23818 --- Comment #5 from Romain Geissler --- After rebuilding libssh2 and a few other open source libraries, now indeed I don't see any more these odd absolute relocations, and now ld.lld happily accepts them as valid input .so files. So it looks

[Bug gold/24123] incremental_copy_test failure when building with gcc-9

2019-02-05 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24123 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com

[Bug gold/23539] --incremental-update doesn't work with GNU properties

2019-02-05 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23539 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com

[Bug gold/24123] incremental_copy_test failure when building with gcc-9

2019-02-06 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24123 --- Comment #1 from Romain Geissler --- Hi, Is it a dup of PR23539 ? Cheers, Romain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-b

[Bug gold/24342] New: [gold] Avoid plt generation for function pointer when building with -fno-plt

2019-03-14 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com Reporter: romain.geissler at amadeus dot com CC: ian at airs dot com Target Milestone: --- Hi, I have a case locally where ld.bfd and ld.gold don't perfor

[Bug gold/24853] OSABI not set when STT_GNU_IFUNC or STB_GNU_UNIQUE symbols output

2019-09-07 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24853 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com

[Bug ld/24981] New: Hit assertion failure in ld/ldlang.c:7504

2019-09-09 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: romain.geissler at amadeus dot com Target Milestone: --- Hi, I have got a new assertion failure when upgrading in my toolchain binutils from 2.32 branch to the trunk (2.32.51) branch. The error happens when I

[Bug ld/24981] Hit assertion failure in ld/ldlang.c:7504

2019-09-09 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24981 --- Comment #2 from Romain Geissler --- gcc version used in this CI build: 6.0.5. However I have other builds using the very latest gcc 8 and gcc 9 branches, they fail as well. I haven't checked though if the gcc 8/9 builds are failing the sam

[Bug ld/24981] Hit assertion failure in ld/ldlang.c:7504

2019-09-09 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24981 --- Comment #3 from Romain Geissler --- erratum: gcc version: 6.5.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org ht

[Bug ld/24981] Hit assertion failure in ld/ldlang.c:7504

2019-09-12 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24981 --- Comment #6 from Romain Geissler --- Thanks, I was just trying to reproduce my issue, in a simpler way than building the full gcc, with no success so far. Cheers, Romain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug ld/24981] Hit assertion failure in ld/ldlang.c:7504

2019-09-12 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24981 --- Comment #7 from Romain Geissler --- I think this should be backported to branch 2.33. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list b

[Bug ld/25477] New: ld 2.34 tries to load ${prefix}/etc/ld.so.conf without expanding ${prefix}

2020-01-28 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: romain.geissler at amadeus dot com Target Milestone: --- Hi, I noticed a regression between GNU ld 2.33 and GNU ld 2.34 (git branch). I don't install ld i

[Bug binutils/25355] nm reports data variable as "T" with -flto

2020-02-13 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25355 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com

[Bug binutils/25355] nm reports data variable as "T" with -flto

2020-02-13 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25355 --- Comment #45 from Romain Geissler --- @Nick, are you ok to cherry-pick commits from branch users/hjl/pr25355/binutils-2_34-branch in the official 2.34 branch ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/25593] --as-needed breaks DT_NEEDED order with linker plugin

2020-02-26 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25593 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com

[Bug binutils/26548] LEB decoding error

2020-08-31 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26548 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com

[Bug gas/26406] Extreme assembling time regression with 2.35 and master

2020-08-31 Thread romain.geissler at amadeus dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26406 Romain Geissler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot com