[Bug ld/6945] New: ld -r severely broken on 64-bit mingw / pe-x86-64

2008-10-06 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
Version: 2.19 Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: mikpe at it dot uu dot se CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC host triplet: i686

[Bug ld/6945] ld -r severely broken on 64-bit mingw / pe-x86-64

2008-10-09 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Additional Comments From mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2008-10-09 15:02 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Hi Mikael, > > So - what is the difference between bug.o and bug2.o ? objdump -h bug*.o bug.o: file format pe-x86-64 Sections: Idx Name Size

[Bug ld/6945] ld -r severely broken on 64-bit mingw / pe-x86-64

2008-10-25 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Additional Comments From mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2008-10-25 09:41 --- (In reply to comment #4) Nick, I've tested your patch and it fixes both the two test cases I posted and the original application where I first noticed the bug. Thanks. /Mikael -- http://sourcewar

[Bug binutils/10263] New: objdump does not disassemble ARM code entered with .word directives

2009-06-11 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: mikpe at it dot uu dot se CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC target triplet: armv5tel-unknown-linux-gnueabi http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10263 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You

[Bug binutils/10263] objdump does not disassemble ARM code entered with .word directives

2009-06-12 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Additional Comments From mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-06-12 15:31 --- Nick, (In reply to comment #1) > > mov r0, r1 > > .word 0xe1a1 > > bx lr > > >0: e1a1mov r0, r1 > >4: e

[Bug binutils/10263] objdump does not disassemble ARM code entered with .word directives

2009-06-13 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
--- Additional Comments From mikpe at it dot uu dot se 2009-06-13 21:31 --- Nick, (In reply to comment #4) > Hi Mike, > > I was thinking about this problem last night and it occurred to me that > there > is a simpler solution. Rather than adding a new pseudo-op t

[Bug gas/11404] New: gas crashes if two mapping symbols have the same value

2010-03-19 Thread mikpe at it dot uu dot se
nutils Version: 2.20 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: mikpe at it dot uu dot se CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC target triplet: ar