[Bug binutils/15183] texinfo-5.0: bfd.texinfo: unknown command `colophon'

2013-02-25 Thread kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15183 Alexander von Gluck IV changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kallisti5 at unixzen dot

[Bug binutils/15183] texinfo-5.0: bfd.texinfo: unknown command `colophon'

2013-02-25 Thread kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15183 --- Comment #2 from Alexander von Gluck IV 2013-02-26 02:43:38 UTC --- A solution for this problem was posted here: http://www.mail-archive.com/bug-binutils@gnu.org/msg14429.html -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userpref

[Bug binutils/16686] New: PowerPC build of binutils fails due to coffcode.h

2014-03-10 Thread kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: kallisti5 at unixzen dot com Created attachment 7461 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7461&action=edit patch to add stdint.h coffcode.h uses intptr_t without including stdint.h

[Bug binutils/16686] PowerPC build of binutils fails due to coffcode.h

2014-03-11 Thread kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16686 --- Comment #3 from Alexander von Gluck IV --- actually the platform was Haiku's PowerPC GCC cross compiler building binutils. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug binutils/16686] PowerPC build of binutils fails due to coffcode.h

2014-03-11 Thread kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16686 --- Comment #4 from Alexander von Gluck IV --- I think the rs6000 files are getting picked up by: pmac_xcoff_vec Looks like Apple hardware was moved into rs6000 back in 2001: https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2001-05/msg00521.html Host is g

[Bug binutils/29009] New: Add pei-risc64 support for native EFI support

2022-03-29 Thread kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: kallisti5 at unixzen dot com Target Milestone: --- On the heels of many other sister tickets (namely #26206, #26218) riscv64 is missing a pei (PE) bfd target for objcopy EFI binaries / loaders. A pei

[Bug ld/24426] New: Binutils 2.28.1 segfault when presented (any) linker script on riscv64

2019-04-08 Thread kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: kallisti5 at unixzen dot com Target Milestone: --- Providing --script= of any kind results in a segfault from ld on riscv64. An empty linker script will result in the same

[Bug ld/24426] Binutils 2.28.1 segfault when presented (any) linker script on riscv64

2019-04-08 Thread kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24426 --- Comment #1 from Alexander von Gluck IV --- I saw d51d92c4d06b6f1b8fee12041cf882e025b84400 (which seems to be in the same general riscv code) and backported to 2.28.1, no change in behaviour/error. -- You are receiving this mail because:

[Bug ld/24426] Binutils 2.28.1 segfault when presented (any) linker script on riscv64

2019-04-09 Thread kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24426 --- Comment #4 from Alexander von Gluck IV --- Here's our riscv config for Haiku: https://git.haiku-os.org/buildtools/tree/gcc/gcc/config/riscv/haiku.h Anything beyond that is "stuff working on other architectures" The linker script definit

[Bug ld/24426] Binutils 2.28.1 segfault when presented (any) linker script on riscv64

2019-04-09 Thread kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24426 --- Comment #5 from Alexander von Gluck IV --- I just took the internal linker script and passed it back in, and it works as expected. Then I used an empty linker script and it segfaulted again. Maybe a bug in 2.28.1 that was fixed by 2.29?

[Bug ld/24426] Binutils 2.28.1 segfault when presented (any) linker script on riscv64

2019-04-09 Thread kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24426 --- Comment #6 from Alexander von Gluck IV --- Ok. I slowly moved through the linker script. If I comment out this section ld segfaults: /* .sdata : { __global_pointer$ = . + 0x800; *(.srodata.cst16) *(.srodata.cst8) *

[Bug ld/24426] Binutils 2.28.1 segfault when presented (any) linker script on riscv64

2019-04-09 Thread kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24426 --- Comment #8 from Alexander von Gluck IV --- I'm ok equating this one to an issue on our end. I think the segfault is an issue, but since I can't reproduce it on binutils 2.29 or later, it might be something already fixed... so we can go ah

[Bug ld/24426] Binutils 2.28.1 segfault when presented (any) linker script on riscv64

2019-04-10 Thread kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24426 Alexander von Gluck IV changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug binutils/26206] New: Add pei-aarch64 support for native EFI support

2020-07-05 Thread kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: kallisti5 at unixzen dot com Target Milestone: --- Generating EFI binaries is possible under arm via --target pei-arm-little --subsystem efi-app It would be nice if the same was possible via

[Bug binutils/26218] New: Invalid coff/pe arm machine type creating EFI binary

2020-07-08 Thread kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: kallisti5 at unixzen dot com Target Milestone: --- objcopy creates invalid ARM EFI bootloaders. objcopy -j .text -j .sdata -j .data -j .dynamic -j .dynsym -j .rel -j .rela -j .reloc -j .dynstr -j

[Bug binutils/26218] Invalid coff/pe arm machine type creating EFI binary

2020-07-09 Thread kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26218 --- Comment #2 from Alexander von Gluck IV --- Hi! So, my toolchain doesn't have pei-arm-wince-little support, so not an easy test. (I can work on building a toolchain with pei-arm-wince-little, but it will take a bit of time) I'll report ba

[Bug binutils/26206] Add pei-aarch64 support for native EFI support

2020-07-09 Thread kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206 --- Comment #2 from Alexander von Gluck IV --- A side note, #26218 is related to this one. while Pe aarch64 doesn't exist in bfd, arm exists... but creates broken coff/non-pe binaries. Interesting that pei-arm literally doesn't create pe bin

[Bug binutils/26206] Add pei-aarch64 support for native EFI support

2021-06-21 Thread kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206 --- Comment #4 from Alexander von Gluck IV --- (In reply to Ed Vielmetti from comment #3) > This issue is mentioned in passing at > https://sources.debian.org/src/shim-signed/1.36/debian/shim-signed.NEWS/ > > shim-signed (1.34) unstable; urge

[Bug binutils/26206] Add pei-aarch64 support for native EFI support

2021-12-13 Thread kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206 --- Comment #28 from Alexander von Gluck IV --- it looks like this one was done and can be closed? :-) It'll be a little while until we (Haiku) update our binutils to be able to test this. For future lurkers, https://git.haiku-os.org/haiku/t

[Bug binutils/26218] Invalid coff/pe arm machine type creating EFI binary

2021-12-13 Thread kallisti5 at unixzen dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26218 --- Comment #6 from Alexander von Gluck IV --- A relevant note for this one. aarch64 Pe EFI target support was seemingly added in https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26206 That one might be good guidance on how to cleanup and ali