[Bug binutils/13355] elf32-rx.c: 2 * bad comparison

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13355 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.kratochvil at redhat

[Bug binutils/15183] New: texinfo-5.0: bfd.texinfo: unknown command `colophon'

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15183 Bug #: 15183 Summary: texinfo-5.0: bfd.texinfo: unknown command `colophon' Product: binutils Version: 2.24 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Co

[Bug binutils/15183] texinfo-5.0: bfd.texinfo: unknown command `colophon'

||jan.kratochvil at redhat ||dot com Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #4 from Jan Kratochvil 2013-02-26 13:21:03 UTC --- Yes, it builds now. Sorry I forgot to close it. -- Configure bugmail: http

[Bug binutils/11983] libbfd reuses pointer passed to bfd_openr

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11983 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com

[Bug binutils/16595] gdb.base/readline-ask load -fsanitize=address error

|unassigned at sourceware dot org |jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/16595] gdb.base/readline-ask load -fsanitize=address error

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16595 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Component|symtab |binutils Version|HEAD

[Bug binutils/16595] gdb.base/readline-ask load -fsanitize=address error

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16595 --- Comment #2 from Jan Kratochvil --- [patch] asan error on bfd bfd_simple_get_relocated_section_contents https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2014-02/msg00096.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/16595] gdb.base/readline-ask load -fsanitize=address error

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16595 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/17677] _bfd_elf_get_synthetic_symtab runs in O(n^2) complexity

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17677 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mr...@courier-mta.com --- Comment #1

[Bug binutils/18386] callw with 0x66 prefix incorrectly disassembled in 64-bit mode

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18386 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com

[Bug binutils/20755] New: readelf: DWARF-5 support

Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com Target Milestone: --- I have started implementing readelf support for DWARF-5 along its consumer implementation for GDB. To prevent possible work duplication if this Bug has been found by anyone

[Bug binutils/20755] readelf: DWARF-5 support

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20755 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com

[Bug binutils/20755] readelf: DWARF-5 support

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20755 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||20757 Referenced Bugs: https://sou

[Bug binutils/20755] readelf: DWARF-5 support

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20755 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Jan Kra

[Bug binutils/20755] readelf: DWARF-5 support

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20755 --- Comment #2 from Jan Kratochvil --- [PATCH 3/6] DWARF-5 basic functionality https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2017-02/msg00138.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. _

[Bug binutils/20755] readelf: DWARF-5 support

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20755 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gold/23455] gold: should the discarded version information warning exist?

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23455 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.kratochvil at redhat dot com

[Bug gas/6957] i386 NOPs must be derived from march not mtune

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6957 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jan.kratochvil at redhat

[Bug ld/12570] New: .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12570 Summary: .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: un

[Bug ld/12570] .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12570 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||12571 -- Configure bugmail: http://s

[Bug gold/12571] New: .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12571 Summary: .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: gold AssignedTo:

[Bug gold/12571] .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12571 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -- Configur

[Bug ld/12570] .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12570 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -- Configur

[Bug ld/12595] New: STT_GNU_IFUNC in ET_EXEC crashes ld

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12595 Summary: STT_GNU_IFUNC in ET_EXEC crashes ld Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: minor Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassig...@s

[Bug ld/12570] .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12570 --- Comment #1 from Jan Kratochvil 2011-06-10 16:00:13 UTC --- RFC: Unwind info for PLT http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2011-06/msg00064.html From: Jakub Jelinek -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email -

[Bug ld/12570] .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12570 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug gold/12571] .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12571 Bug 12571 depends on bug 12570, which changed state. Bug 12570 Summary: .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12570 What|Old Value |New Value -

[Bug ld/13177] garbage collector retains zombie references to external libraries

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13177 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||13232 -- Configure bugmail: http://s

[Bug ld/13232] New: Regression: --gc-sections: local symbol `_dl_argv@@GLIBC_PRIVATE' in ld.so is referenced by DSO

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13232 Bug #: 13232 Summary: Regression: --gc-sections: local symbol `_dl_argv@@GLIBC_PRIVATE' in ld.so is referenced by DSO Product: binutils Version: 2.23 (HEAD)

[Bug ld/13233] New: --gc-sections discards .debug_types

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13233 Bug #: 13233 Summary: --gc-sections discards .debug_types Product: binutils Version: 2.23 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld

[Bug ld/13195] -ffunction-sections -Wl,--gc-sections failure with symbol versioning

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13195 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||13233 -- Configure bugmail: http://s

[Bug ld/13233] --gc-sections discards .debug_types

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13233 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||13195 --- Comment #1 from Jan Kratoch

[Bug ld/13195] -ffunction-sections -Wl,--gc-sections failure with symbol versioning

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13195 --- Comment #7 from Jan Kratochvil 2011-09-29 04:43:56 UTC --- Confirming it works now, thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the

[Bug ld/13233] --gc-sections discards .debug_types

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13233 --- Comment #7 from Jan Kratochvil 2011-09-29 04:43:26 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > a) It's a gcc bug to put .debug_types in a single member comdat group since it > totally ignores current linker limitations regarding group processing.