--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2007-09-12 20:07
---
Ahem, on x86, GAS displays:
Warning:value 0x34567890 truncated to 0x7890
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5026
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
nspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: evandro at yahoo dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.c
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2007-10-12 22:03
---
Created an attachment (id=2041)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2041&action=view)
Proposed fix.
I believe that the function local_symbol_convert should do the proper
con
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2007-10-12 22:05
---
(From update of attachment 2041)
Index: gas/symbols.c
===
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -p -u -w -r1.3 symbols.c
--- gas/symbols.c 26 Oct 2006
--
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #2041 is|0 |1
obsolete||
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5170
-
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2007-10-13 16:39
---
Interesting, for it seems that unless local_symbol_convert is used, the frag
information is lost and it results in an assertion at elf_common when the symbol
is local (starting with "." or "L&q
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: evandro at yahoo dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5866
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2008-03-04 17:26
---
Created an attachment (id=2303)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2303&action=view)
Regular module
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5866
--- You are receivi
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2008-03-04 17:27
---
Created an attachment (id=2304)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2304&action=view)
Archived module
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5866
--- You are receivi
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2008-03-04 17:29
---
Instructions to reproduce this issue:
as d.s -o d.o
as e.s -o e.o
ar r e.a e.o
The command below results in both "e4" and "ef" to be placed in .bss:
ld d.o e.a
Whereas the command below
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl dot tools at gmail dot
||com
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2008-03-05 00:11
---
"-G size" sets the global g_switch_value in LD. This value is used to with
bfd_set_gp_size in ldlang_add_file for regular modules. However,
ldlang_add_file is never called for archived modules.
Unf
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2008-03-06 17:45
---
Their ABIs are not specific, except that symbols referred to via the GP register
must reside in the small data sections. In the case of common symbols, in
.sbss, which doesn't happen at the moment if the s
.end
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: evandro at yahoo dot com
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2008-03-06 23:32
---
Created an attachment (id=2311)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2311&action=view)
Proposed patch to fix this issue.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5895
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2008-03-07 04:57
---
Well, yes, the link is succesfull, but the problem is where common symbols in
archived modules end up.
Please, rerun ld with -G 8 and then run objdump on the output files and confirm
that e4 is in .sbss and ef
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2008-03-07 16:46
---
Could you please e-mail me "good" and "bad"? I wonder if PPC is similar to MIPS
in using small data sections.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5866
--- You are
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: evandro at yahoo dot com
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2008-04-17 23:04
---
Created an attachment (id=2707)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2707&action=view)
Patch for correct --sort-common.
Either the documentation or the implementation is incorrect.
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2008-04-20 18:21
---
Sure, but I'll be hitting the road this week. Later on then.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6430
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for th
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2008-04-22 01:05
---
You are correct in that this way a gap would be avoided when the size changes.
But given that all like-sized symbols are laid out back to back, this only
happens when the size changes.
So, either the manual
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2008-04-22 16:56
---
As a matter of fact, the current implementation actually sorts by alignment.
I like Nick's suggestion, only I prefer terser wording, such as "ascending" or
"descending". B
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2008-05-01 23:23
---
Created an attachment (id=2720)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2720&action=view)
Change the documentation according to the code.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17592
Evandro Menezes changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||evandro at yahoo dot com
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2008-05-21 14:01
---
I think that the choice should be available. I'll craft it up in a moment.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6430
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
--- Additional Comments From evandro at yahoo dot com 2008-05-21 21:35
---
Created an attachment (id=2750)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2750&action=view)
Patch providing the user with a choice.
Please, review this patch that allows the user to choose
26 matches
Mail list logo
