[Bug gprofng/29113] New: Build error for x86_64-w64-mingw32 host since CLOCK_MONOTONIC does not exist

2022-05-01 Thread euloanty at live dot com
Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: euloanty at live dot com Target Milestone: --- ../../../../../../binutils-gdb/gprofng/libcollector/gethrtime.c: In function 'linux_geth

[Bug gprofng/29113] Build error for x86_64-w64-mingw32 host since CLOCK_MONOTONIC does not exist

2022-05-01 Thread euloanty at live dot com
Host||x86_64-w64-mingw32 CC||euloanty at live dot com Build||x86_64-linux-gnu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/29113] Build error for x86_64-w64-mingw32 host since CLOCK_MONOTONIC does not exist

2022-05-01 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29113 --- Comment #1 from cqwrteur --- i do canadian compilation for windows to build linux programs. gprofng simply does not correctly support windows host. Needs to block it in the build script -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug gprofng/29113] Build error for x86_64-w64-mingw32 host since CLOCK_MONOTONIC does not exist

2022-05-03 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29113 --- Comment #3 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Vladimir Mezentsev from comment #2) > How do you configure your build ? > > gprofng should not be built for x86_64-w64-mingw32. > Only these platforms are supported: > > % cat gprofng/configure.

[Bug gprofng/29113] Build error for x86_64-w64-mingw32 host since CLOCK_MONOTONIC does not exist

2022-05-03 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29113 --- Comment #4 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Vladimir Mezentsev from comment #2) > How do you configure your build ? > > gprofng should not be built for x86_64-w64-mingw32. > Only these platforms are supported: > > % cat gprofng/configure.

[Bug gprofng/29113] Build error for x86_64-w64-mingw32 host since CLOCK_MONOTONIC does not exist

2022-05-03 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29113 --- Comment #5 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Vladimir Mezentsev from comment #2) > How do you configure your build ? > > gprofng should not be built for x86_64-w64-mingw32. > Only these platforms are supported: > > % cat gprofng/configure.

[Bug gprofng/29131] New: No rule to make target 'gprofng.1', needed by 'all-am'. Stop

2022-05-08 Thread euloanty at live dot com
D Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: euloanty at live dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 14096 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14096&am

[Bug gprofng/29131] No rule to make target 'gprofng.1', needed by 'all-am'. Stop. For arm

2022-05-08 Thread euloanty at live dot com
|x86_64-linux-gnu Target||aarch64-linux-gnu CC| |euloanty at live dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/29131] No rule to make target 'gprofng.1', needed by 'all-am'. Stop. For arm

2022-05-09 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29131 --- Comment #2 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Vladimir Mezentsev from comment #1) > I cannot reproduce this on my build. > How do you configure your build ? > Is it Intel or Arm ? aarch64-linux-gnu target and host Build on x86_64-linux-gnu

[Bug gprofng/29148] New: bison version too new??

2022-05-14 Thread euloanty at live dot com
Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: euloanty at live dot com Target Milestone: --- checking for bison 3.0.4 or newer... 3.8.2, bad configure: error: Building gprofng requires bison 3.0.4 or later. bison --version bison (GNU Bison) 3.8.2 Written by Robert

[Bug gprofng/29148] bison version too new??

2022-05-14 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29148 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Build||x86_64-linux-gnu Host|

[Bug gprofng/29148] bison version too new??

2022-05-14 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29148 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||euloanty at live dot com -- You are

[Bug gprofng/29148] bison version too new??

2022-05-14 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29148 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/29218] libiberty cannot find __imp___acrt_iob_func for x86_64-w64-mingw32 cross toolchain for canadian compilation

2022-06-01 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29218 --- Comment #1 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 14128 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14128&action=edit config file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/29218] libiberty cannot find __imp___acrt_iob_func for x86_64-w64-mingw32 cross toolchain for canadian compilation

2022-06-01 Thread euloanty at live dot com
||i586-msdosdjgp Host||x86_64-w64-mingw32 CC||euloanty at live dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/29218] New: libiberty cannot find __imp___acrt_iob_func for x86_64-w64-mingw32 cross toolchain for canadian compilation

2022-06-01 Thread euloanty at live dot com
: unspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: euloanty at live dot com Target Milestone: --- /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/13.0.0

[Bug binutils/29218] libiberty cannot find __imp___acrt_iob_func for x86_64-w64-mingw32 cross toolchain for canadian compilation

2022-06-01 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29218 --- Comment #2 from cqwrteur --- https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=7273d78f3f7ae3701512f1ff423430f51b011ece I believe it breaks because of this commitment. It makes the binary compiled with the build compiler instead o

[Bug binutils/29218] libiberty cannot find __imp___acrt_iob_func for x86_64-w64-mingw32 cross toolchain for canadian compilation

2022-06-01 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29218 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com -- You are receiv

[Bug binutils/29218] libiberty cannot find __imp___acrt_iob_func for x86_64-w64-mingw32 cross toolchain for canadian compilation

2022-06-01 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29218 --- Comment #3 from cqwrteur --- BTW. The xmalloc thing should be just __builtin_trap(). No more debugging information and recovery thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/29218] libiberty cannot find __imp___acrt_iob_func for x86_64-w64-mingw32 cross toolchain for canadian compilation

2022-06-01 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29218 --- Comment #4 from cqwrteur --- void* xmalloc(size_t sz) noexcept { void* ptr = malloc(sz); if(!ptr) __builtin_trap(); return ptr; } Thank you. Since stdio on mingw-w64 bloats binary size. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug binutils/29218] libiberty cannot find __imp___acrt_iob_func for x86_64-w64-mingw32 cross toolchain for canadian compilation

2022-06-01 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29218 --- Comment #5 from cqwrteur --- https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=b0de9ed86f3af84fbd636f94a58b9c4ad7f4e743 well it looks like this does not fix Canadian compilation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You a

[Bug gprofng/29593] New: error: '__u64' undeclared (first use in this function) for aarch64-linux-musl host

2022-09-20 Thread euloanty at live dot com
NCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: euloanty at live dot com Target Milestone: --- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprofng/29593] error: '__u64' undeclared (first use in this function) for aarch64-linux-musl host

2022-09-20 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29593 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||euloanty at live dot com

[Bug gprofng/29593] error: '__u64' undeclared (first use in this function) for aarch64-linux-musl host

2022-09-20 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29593 --- Comment #1 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 14341 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14341&action=edit bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gold/29678] Unsupported target for loongrach64-linux-gnu for linker

2022-10-12 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29678 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Target||loongarch64-linux-gnu Host|

[Bug gold/29678] Unsupported target for loongrach64-linux-gnu for linker

2022-10-12 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29678 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||euloanty at live dot com

[Bug gold/29678] New: Unsupported target for loongrach64-linux-gnu for linker

2022-10-12 Thread euloanty at live dot com
Priority: P2 Component: gold Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com Reporter: euloanty at live dot com CC: ian at airs dot com Target Milestone: --- configure: error: "unsupported target loongarch64-unknown-linux-gnu" make[1]: *** [Mak

[Bug ld/29797] New: error while loading shared libraries: unexpected PLT reloc type 0x00

2022-11-16 Thread euloanty at live dot com
Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: euloanty at live dot com Target Milestone: --- #include [[__gnu__::__target__("avx2")]] inline void foo() { puts("avx2\n"); } [[__gnu__:

[Bug ld/29797] error while loading shared libraries: unexpected PLT reloc type 0x00

2022-11-16 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29797 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||euloanty at live dot com -- You are

[Bug ld/29797] error while loading shared libraries: unexpected PLT reloc type 0x00

2022-11-16 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29797 --- Comment #1 from cqwrteur --- gold linker works while ld does not work for __gnu__::__target__ attribute. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/29797] error while loading shared libraries: unexpected PLT reloc type 0x00

2022-11-16 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29797 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |2.40 (HEAD) -- You are receiving this mai

[Bug ld/29797] error while loading shared libraries: unexpected PLT reloc type 0x00

2022-11-16 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29797 --- Comment #2 from cqwrteur --- BTW why [[__gnu__::__target__("sha")]] does not work while [[__gnu__::__target__("ssse3,sha")]] would compile but not with clang?? https://godbolt.org/z/bTfTM8chz -- You are receiving this mail because: Yo

[Bug binutils/29866] New: Build stuck at "checking for ELF support in BFD..." for x86_64-w64-mingw32 host at canadian compilation

2022-12-08 Thread euloanty at live dot com
nspecified Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: euloanty at live dot com Target Milestone: --- checking compiler warning flags... -Wall -Wpointer-arith -Wno-unuse

[Bug binutils/29866] Build stuck at "checking for ELF support in BFD..." for x86_64-w64-mingw32 host at canadian compilation

2022-12-08 Thread euloanty at live dot com
||euloanty at live dot com Host||x86_64-w64-mingw32 Build||x86_64-linux-gnu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/29866] Build stuck at "checking for ELF support in BFD..." for x86_64-w64-mingw32 host at canadian compilation

2022-12-13 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29866 --- Comment #2 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1) > This is in libctf configure. For me, I see the following in > libctf/config.log: > configure:14586: checking for ELF support in BFD > configure:14606: ./libtool --qui

[Bug binutils/29866] Build stuck at "checking for ELF support in BFD..." for x86_64-w64-mingw32 host at canadian compilation

2022-12-13 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29866 --- Comment #3 from cqwrteur --- checking for ELF support in BFD... libtool: link: Could not determine host path corresponding to -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/29866] Build stuck at "checking for ELF support in BFD..." for x86_64-w64-mingw32 host at canadian compilation

2022-12-14 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29866 --- Comment #4 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1) > This is in libctf configure. For me, I see the following in > libctf/config.log: > configure:14586: checking for ELF support in BFD > configure:14606: ./libtool --qui

[Bug binutils/29866] Build stuck at "checking for ELF support in BFD..." for x86_64-w64-mingw32 host at canadian compilation

2022-12-14 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29866 --- Comment #5 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 14517 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14517&action=edit hang -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/29866] Build hang at "checking for ELF support in BFD..." for x86_64-w64-mingw32 host at canadian compilation

2022-12-14 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29866 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Build stuck at "checking|Build hang at "checking for

[Bug ld/29973] New: x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-01-07 Thread euloanty at live dot com
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: euloanty at live dot com Target Milestone: --- x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ -o helloworld helloworld.cc -Ofast -std=c++23 -s -flto -march=native -I

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-01-07 Thread euloanty at live dot com
||euloanty at live dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-01-07 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #1 from cqwrteur --- clang + lld works but ld does not. Yes, it is the issue that relates to ld linker. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-01-07 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unspecified |2.41 (HEAD) -- You are receiving this mai

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-01-07 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical -- You are receiving this mail b

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-01-14 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #2 from cqwrteur --- Nobody comes and fixes this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-01-14 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com -- You are r

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-01-14 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P1 -- You are receiving this mail because

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-01-22 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lh_mouse at 126 dot com -- You are receiv

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-01-22 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #3 from cqwrteur --- Is that a mingw-w64 issue or libstdc++ issue? Or is it just because of the ld linker? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-01-24 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #5 from cqwrteur --- nope. none of them work. I can only make it work with lld. it does not work when the code dynamically linked with libstdc++ Probably it is the latest patch on GCC that changes the win32 thread model causes the

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-01-24 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com -- You are r

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-01-24 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #6 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #5) > Created attachment 14622 [details] > C249694B8E474FF2AE570A876F184D45.png > > nope. none of them work. I can only make it work with lld. > it does not work when the cod

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-01-24 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #8 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #6) > > Hi jwakely, I do not know whether it is an issue that relates to win32 > > thread model of libstdc++ or it is the issue

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-01-24 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #9 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #6) > > Hi jwakely, I do not know whether it is an issue that relates to win32 > > thread model of libstdc++ or it is the issue

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-01-24 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #10 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #4) > Hi cqwrteur, > > I am afraid that we are going to need some more information before we can > get to the bottom of this issue. For example: > > * What is the

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-01-25 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #11 from cqwrteur --- Does the issue come from this patch? https://github.com/mirror/mingw-w64/commit/fc55e181b2d84c8817e3fd9d86c6944ac709acc9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-01-25 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #13 from cqwrteur --- lld does not work for canadian building compiler Get Outlook for Android From: nickc at redhat dot com Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2023 8:37:38 AM To

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-01-26 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #15 from cqwrteur --- it is because of gcc 13 i guess. Old versions of mingw-w64 have the same issue. it is probably libstdc++'s problem since recently they made changes on adding C++ standard library threading support for win32 th

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-01 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #16 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 14649 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14649&action=edit libstdc++.dll.a I think the issue comes with libstdc++.dll.a but I am not sure. Can you have a look at libstd

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-03 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at redhat dot com -- You are receiv

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-03 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #19 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #18) > Created attachment 14652 [details] > Proposed patch > > Interesting. The issue is the section itself: .rdata_r. This is not a > normal PE section name, and it i

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-05 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #20 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #18) > Created attachment 14652 [details] > Proposed patch > > Interesting. The issue is the section itself: .rdata_r. This is not a > normal PE section name, and it i

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-05 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #21 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #20) > (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #18) > > Created attachment 14652 [details] > > Proposed patch > > > > Interesting. The issue is the section itself: .rdata_r.

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-06 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #23 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #22) > (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #21) > > (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #20) > > > (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #18) > > > > Created attachment 14652

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-06 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #22 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #21) > (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #20) > > (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #18) > > > Created attachment 14652 [details] > > > Proposed patch > > > > > > Inte

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-07 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #25 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #24) > Created attachment 14656 [details] > Proposed patch > > Hi, > > Oops - I forgot about section names containing the $ character. > > Please could you try out

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-07 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #26 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #25) > (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #24) > > Created attachment 14656 [details] > > Proposed patch > > > > Hi, > > > > Oops - I forgot about section names conta

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-07 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #27 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 14659 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14659&action=edit iostream -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-09 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #29 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 14666 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14666&action=edit This is my build script -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-09 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #28 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #24) > Created attachment 14656 [details] > Proposed patch > > Hi, > > Oops - I forgot about section names containing the $ character. > > Please could you try out

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-13 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #30 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #24) > Created attachment 14656 [details] > Proposed patch > > Hi, > > Oops - I forgot about section names containing the $ character. > > Please could you try out

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-16 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #33 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #32) > Hi, > > I am wondering if there are two problems here, rather than just one. So > please could you check a couple of things for me ? > > 1. Does iostream.ex

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-16 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #34 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #33) > (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #32) > > Hi, > > > > I am wondering if there are two problems here, rather than just one. So > > please could you check a co

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-16 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #35 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #32) > Hi, > > I am wondering if there are two problems here, rather than just one. So > please could you check a couple of things for me ? > > 1. Does iostream.ex

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-16 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #36 from cqwrteur --- https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/ec59848074ba8c4310cbadb603822bfaeff03a32 See this -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-16 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com -- You are r

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-16 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #37 from cqwrteur --- jwakely do you think it is caused by __init_priority__ ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-02-23 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #38 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #32) > Hi, > > I am wondering if there are two problems here, rather than just one. So > please could you check a couple of things for me ? > > 1. Does iostream.ex

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-03-06 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #39 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #14) > Well I have just tried x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ from Fedora rawhide (which is > based on gcc version 12) and I still cannot reproduce the problem. So I am > beginni

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-03-11 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 --- Comment #40 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #32) > Hi, > > I am wondering if there are two problems here, rather than just one. So > please could you check a couple of things for me ? > > 1. Does iostream.ex

[Bug ld/30254] New: iostream crashes with ld linker for windows targets

2023-03-20 Thread euloanty at live dot com
Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: euloanty at live dot com Target Milestone: --- Bug issue 29973 was a mess. So I decided to start a new one and close bug 29973. GCC 13 made several changes to iostream, including making it with an

[Bug ld/30254] iostream crashes with ld linker for windows targets

2023-03-20 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P1 Severity|normal

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-03-20 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ld/30254] iostream crashes with ld linker for windows targets

2023-03-20 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||euloanty at live dot com -- You are

[Bug ld/30254] iostream crashes with ld linker for windows targets

2023-04-01 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com -- You are receiv

[Bug ld/30375] C++ std::cout's rdbuf gives ridiculous address on windows with dynamic linking

2023-04-20 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P1 -- You are receiving this mail because

[Bug ld/30375] New: C++ std::cout's rdbuf gives ridiculous address on windows with dynamic linking

2023-04-20 Thread euloanty at live dot com
IRMED Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: euloanty at live dot com Target Milestone: --- struct foo { foo() { __builtin_puts("hello\n");

[Bug ld/30375] C++ std::cout's rdbuf gives ridiculous address on windows with dynamic linking

2023-04-20 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-w64-mingw32 -- You are receiving t

[Bug ld/30375] C++ std::cout's rdbuf gives ridiculous address on windows with dynamic linking

2023-04-20 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375 --- Comment #1 from cqwrteur --- 6156746547736C54 is clearly not a possible address. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30375] C++ std::cout's rdbuf gives ridiculous address on windows with dynamic linking with ld

2023-04-20 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|C++ std::cout's rdbuf gives |C++ std::cout's rdbuf gives

[Bug ld/30375] C++ std::cout's rdbuf gives ridiculous address on windows with dynamic linking with ld

2023-04-20 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||29973 Referenced Bugs: https://sourcewar

[Bug ld/29973] x86_64-w64-mingw32-g++ ld: helloworld.exe:.rdata_r: section below image base for windows

2023-04-20 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||30375 Referenced Bugs: https://sourcewar

[Bug ld/30375] C++ std::cout's rdbuf gives ridiculous address on windows with dynamic linking with ld

2023-04-21 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||euloanty at live dot com -- You are

[Bug ld/30375] C++ std::cout's rdbuf gives ridiculous address on windows with dynamic linking with ld

2023-05-07 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com,

[Bug ld/30254] iostream crashes with ld linker for windows targets

2023-05-20 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254 --- Comment #2 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1) > Does this problem still occur after my patch for pr30343? Yes, it still occurs. Just crashing for hello world. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on th

[Bug ld/30254] iostream crashes with ld linker for windows targets

2023-05-20 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254 --- Comment #3 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #2) > (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1) > > Does this problem still occur after my patch for pr30343? > > Yes, it still occurs. Just crashing for hello world. 30375

[Bug ld/30254] iostream crashes with ld linker for windows targets

2023-05-20 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254 --- Comment #4 from cqwrteur --- https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30375 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/30254] iostream crashes with ld linker for windows targets

2023-05-20 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254 --- Comment #5 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1) > Does this problem still occur after my patch for pr30343? Please fix this asap. I have reported this for half a year and it is still unfixed. This breaks basically ev

[Bug ld/30254] iostream crashes with ld linker for windows targets

2023-05-21 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com -- You are receiv

[Bug ld/30254] iostream crashes with ld linker for windows targets

2023-05-21 Thread euloanty at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30254 --- Comment #6 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 14891 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14891&action=edit ld missing import of ios_base_library_init I use lld and it imports one more symbol than ld. I guess it is th

  1   2   3   >