nedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: bunk at stusta dot de
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5946
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on
--- Additional Comments From bunk at stusta dot de 2008-03-16 20:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=2328)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2328&action=view)
patch removing is_same_frag()
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5946
---
] xtensa: fix compile failure with gcc 4.3
Product: binutils
Version: 2.19 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: bunk at stusta dot
--- Additional Comments From bunk at stusta dot de 2008-04-04 21:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=2354)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2354&action=view)
gas/config/tc-xtensa.c:xg_apply_fix_value(): terminate with as_fatal() if
decode_reloc() returns a
t com
ReportedBy: bunk at stusta dot de
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: sh64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6043
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone w
--- Additional Comments From bunk at stusta dot de 2008-04-06 18:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=2359)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2359&action=view)
libgcc2.s
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6043
--- You are receiving th
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: bunk at stusta dot de
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet:
--- Additional Comments From bunk at stusta dot de 2008-07-15 14:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=2829)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2829&action=view)
verbose build log
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6747
--- You are receivi
--- Additional Comments From bunk at stusta dot de 2008-07-15 14:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=2830)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2830&action=view)
do_mounts.o
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6747
--- You are receiving th
)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: bunk at stusta dot de
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host
--- Additional Comments From bunk at stusta dot de 2008-07-15 18:27 ---
Created an attachment (id=2831)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2831&action=view)
.tmp_main.o
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6748
--- You are receiving th
--- Additional Comments From bunk at stusta dot de 2008-07-15 18:28 ---
Created an attachment (id=2832)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2832&action=view)
.tmp_main.ver
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6748
--- You are receiving th
--- Additional Comments From bunk at stusta dot de 2008-07-15 19:43 ---
Perhaps since I have a 32bit userspace (I verbatim copied Host/Build from the
configure output, but although I have a 64bit kernel it's a 32bit userspace)?
After compiling with "-O0 -g" it becomes cl
--- Additional Comments From bunk at stusta dot de 2008-07-15 20:05 ---
Thanks, I can confirm that your patch fixes the segfault.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6748
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are
: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: bunk at stusta dot de
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: sh-unknown-linux-gnu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6750
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From bunk at stusta dot de 2008-07-16 16:23 ---
Created an attachment (id=2833)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2833&action=view)
ffssi2.s
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6750
--- You are receiving th
--- Additional Comments From bunk at stusta dot de 2008-08-10 20:28 ---
In this case it's an error on my side - I'm building the compiler for
compile-only tests and me fiddling with multilibs then broke it.
--
What|Removed
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: bunk at stusta dot de
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC ta
--- Additional Comments From bunk at stusta dot de 2009-01-25 20:23 ---
$ cat test.S
setlos #0xe000,gr3
$ /path/to/32bit-binutils/bin/frv-linux-as test.S
$ /path/to/64bit-binutils/bin/frv-linux-as test.S
test.S: Assembler messages:
test.S:1: Error: operand out of
--- Additional Comments From bunk at stusta dot de 2009-01-25 20:51 ---
As far as I know it is not a regression.
I recently switched my host from 32bit to 64bit, and after rebuilding my cross
toolchains I ran into this issue.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9785
--- Additional Comments From bunk at stusta dot de 2009-02-01 15:41 ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> "Doesn't support" is quite strong. It was mostly developed on 64-bit hosts.
>...
Changing the Subject back to what I did set in the beginning.
--
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: bunk at stusta dot de
CC: amodra at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: 2.44
https://bugs.debian.org/1093895
$ cat xen/arch/x86/efi/buildid.ihex
:100064864D8DAD57140014
22 matches
Mail list logo
