[Bug gas/24559] New: load pseudo-operation handling bug with Armv8-M Baseline

2019-05-15 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Hello, When trying to assemble a load pseudo-operation for Cortex-M23 gas currently incorrectly errors out: $ cat t.s ldr r0, =(0x30

[Bug gas/24559] load pseudo-operation handling bug with Armv8-M Baseline

2019-05-15 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24559 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm-* -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug gas/24559] load pseudo-operation handling bug with Armv8-M Baseline

2019-05-15 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24559 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |avieira at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug gas/24559] load pseudo-operation handling bug with Armv8-M Baseline

2019-05-15 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24559 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Build||2.27, 2.28, 2.29, 2.30,

[Bug gas/24559] load pseudo-operation handling bug with Armv8-M Baseline

2019-05-16 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24559 --- Comment #1 from Andre Vieira --- Patch up for review on the mailing list https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2019-05/msg00201.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___

[Bug binutils/24460] bfd/elf32-arm.c: get_value_helper, uninitialized value used

2019-05-21 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Andre Vieira --- I messed up the commit message for bfd/ChangeLog in https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h

[Bug gas/24559] load pseudo-operation handling bug with Armv8-M Baseline

2019-05-23 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24559 --- Comment #3 from Andre Vieira --- Backported this to 2.32, not planning any other backports. OK To close ticket? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ b

[Bug gas/25376] New: Setting FPU reset's MVE feature bits but FPU can't set MVE feature bits

2020-01-13 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
ty: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- GAS -mfpu command-line option and .fpu assembler directive reset the MVE feature bits but can't set it. I.e. -mf

[Bug gas/25376] Setting FPU reset's MVE feature bits but FPU can't set MVE feature bits

2020-01-13 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
|unassigned at sourceware dot org |avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Build||2.33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/25472] New: [Arm] +mve does not enable DSP instructions

2020-01-27 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- MVE architecturally demands the implementation of the DSP extensions, so +mve should also enable DSP instructions like uadd8 r0, r1, r2. -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug gas/25472] [Arm] +mve does not enable DSP instructions

2020-01-27 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25472 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |avieira at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug gas/25472] [Arm] +mve does not enable DSP instructions

2020-01-31 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25472 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gas/25660] New: Failing to parse vsublt in an it block with MVE enabled

2020-03-12 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following assembly will be wrongly rejected if mve is enabled: .syntax unified .text itt lt vsublt.f32 s0, s1, s2 vaddlt.f32 s0, s1, s2

[Bug gas/25660] Failing to parse vsublt in an it block with MVE enabled

2020-03-12 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25660 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |avieira at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug gas/25376] Setting FPU reset's MVE feature bits but FPU can't set MVE feature bits

2020-03-13 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25376 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug gas/25660] Failing to parse vsublt in an it block with MVE enabled

2020-03-13 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25660 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug gas/25863] New: MVE: Issue with scalar vmul inside an it block

2020-04-22 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- When parsing the following with -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve.fp, GAS currently wrongfully rejects it. .syntax unified .text it lt vmullt.f32 s0, s1, s2 In my original

[Bug gas/25863] MVE: Issue with scalar vmul inside an it block

2020-04-22 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25863 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |avieira at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug gas/25863] MVE: Issue with scalar vmul inside an it block

2020-05-07 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25863 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gas/25992] Wrong Tag_CPU_arch_profile for armv8-r

2020-05-15 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25992 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug gas/25992] Wrong Tag_CPU_arch_profile for armv8-r

2020-05-19 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25992 --- Comment #11 from Andre Vieira --- Nick were you able to reproduce this locally? I have tried a bunch of different arm targets and branches but could not reproduce this behaviour, which is weird... Might be there is some other issue masking

[Bug gas/25992] Wrong Tag_CPU_arch_profile for armv8-r

2020-05-19 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25992 --- Comment #14 from Andre Vieira --- Oh doh... I was looking at the Tag_CPU_arch instead of arch_profile. Sorry Alexander. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/26858] [arm] unsupported vmul instruction for vfp5-sp-d16 + armv8-r

2020-11-12 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26858 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug gas/26858] [arm] unsupported vmul instruction for vfp5-sp-d16 + armv8-r

2020-11-13 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26858 --- Comment #4 from Andre Vieira --- I'll wait a week or so before backporting to affected branches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gas/26858] [arm] unsupported vmul instruction for vfp5-sp-d16 + armv8-r

2020-11-19 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26858 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug binutils/32324] New: Stripping BOLT'ed binaries leads to unwanted behaviour

2024-10-30 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
y: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Hi, Similar to https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/56738 when we use Binutil's strip to strip a binary optimized with BOLT i

[Bug binutils/32324] Stripping BOLT'ed binaries leads to unwanted behaviour

2024-10-30 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32324 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Target||aarch64-none-linux-gnu -- You are rec

[Bug binutils/32324] Stripping BOLT'ed binaries leads to unwanted behaviour

2024-11-06 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32324 --- Comment #1 from Andre Vieira --- I did a bit more investigation and looking through the sections in the warning I noticed something odd. readelf --sections shows me: Section Headers: [Nr] Name Type Address

[Bug binutils/32324] Stripping BOLT'ed binaries leads to unwanted behaviour

2024-12-02 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32324 --- Comment #2 from Andre Vieira --- Further investigations showed that things started to go wrong when the LOAD header in question is given an offset of where the previous header left off, which is normally fine, but this is severely under th

[Bug binutils/32324] Stripping BOLT'ed binaries leads to unwanted behaviour

2025-01-07 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32324 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug binutils/32324] Stripping BOLT'ed binaries leads to unwanted behaviour

2025-01-07 Thread avieira at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32324 --- Comment #6 from Andre Vieira --- Scrap that, probably best not to backport. Oh and thank you Alan! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.