[Bug binutils/716] strip doesn't maintain /LARGEADDRESSAWARE flag (mingw build, Windows 2000)

2005-02-11 Thread Jan dot Nijtmans at xs4all dot nl
--- Additional Comments From Jan dot Nijtmans at xs4all dot nl 2005-02-11 16:08 --- Created an attachment (id=403) --> (http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=403&action=view) Example executable with the /LARGEADDRESSAWARE flag set Here is an examp

[Bug binutils/716] New: strip doesn't maintain /LARGEADDRESSAWARE flag (mingw build, Windows 2000)

2005-02-11 Thread Jan dot Nijtmans at xs4all dot nl
build, Windows 2000) Product: binutils Version: 2.15 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: Jan dot Nijtmans at xs4all dot nl

[Bug binutils/716] strip doesn't maintain /LARGEADDRESSAWARE flag (mingw build, Windows 2000)

2005-02-11 Thread Jan dot Nijtmans at xs4all dot nl
--- Additional Comments From Jan dot Nijtmans at xs4all dot nl 2005-02-11 22:41 --- Subject: Re: strip doesn't maintain /LARGEADDRESSAWARE flag (mingw build, Windows 2000) nickc at redhat dot com wrote: > /* XXX: Should we be copying other pe_data() fields as well ? */

[Bug binutils/716] strip doesn't maintain /LARGEADDRESSAWARE flag (mingw build, Windows 2000)

2005-02-14 Thread Jan dot Nijtmans at xs4all dot nl
--- Additional Comments From Jan dot Nijtmans at xs4all dot nl 2005-02-14 13:11 --- Subject: Re: strip doesn't maintain /LARGEADDRESSAWARE flag (mingw build, Windows 2000) nickc at redhat dot com wrote: > So I have checked in this version of the patch: Yes, that's