https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32403
Bug ID: 32403
Summary: objdump -d reports a superfluous "{evex}" string
Product: binutils
Version: 2.44 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32403
--- Comment #3 from Haochen Jiang ---
I will have a look into that.
>From my memory in assembler implementation, the {evex} prefix relies on and
only on the register usage. It won't check memory and will not consider whether
an instruction wi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32403
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 15809
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15809&action=edit
A patch
Something like this. Haochen, can you take it over? Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32403
--- Comment #4 from Haochen Jiang ---
(In reply to Haochen Jiang from comment #3)
> I will have a look into that.
>
> From my memory in assembler implementation, the {evex} prefix relies on and
> only on the register usage. It won't check mem
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32403
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haochen.jiang at intel dot com,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32399
--- Comment #3 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8ab91a033555c5faae1bcd615800670b91673731
commit 8ab91a033555c5faae1bcd615800670b91673731
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #71 from mintsuki ---
Could, in principle, this issue be addressed now that glibc bug #31799 has been
fixed?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
