[Bug gas/21683] [avr] Support a pseudo-instruction to allow more efficient GCC ISR prologues

2024-11-29 Thread gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21683 --- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay --- For the documentation of pseudo instruction __gcc_isr see https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.29/as/AVR-Pseudo-Instructions.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

[Bug gas/32391] \@ incorrectly handled in nested macros

2024-11-29 Thread regis.duchesne at broadcom dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32391 --- Comment #4 from Regis Duchesne --- Hi Nick, > I assume that you also feel the same about \+, correct ? I feel the same about all arguments (explicit or implicit) which have the same name in an outer and an inner macro. That includes any