https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
mintsuki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31800
Bug ID: 31800
Summary: src-release.sh recursively changes permissions of
everything in to 0777
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31800
Rostislav Krasny changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rostiprodev at gmail dot com
--
Y
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #21 from mintsuki ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #20)
> It turns out that static PIE with non-zero load address must have ET_EXEC:
>
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799
>
> Otherwise, there is no way fo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #22 from mintsuki ---
As far as I can tell, the linked issue seems to indicate more so that this is
indeed a problem rather than some glibc bug.
Does glibc crash without any patch if you patch ld.bfd to create an ET_DYN
instead?
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to mintsuki from comment #21)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #20)
> > It turns out that static PIE with non-zero load address must have ET_EXEC:
> >
> > https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #24 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to mintsuki from comment #22)
> As far as I can tell, the linked issue seems to indicate more so that this
> is indeed a problem rather than some glibc bug.
>
> Does glibc crash without any patch if
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #25 from mintsuki ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #23)
> (In reply to mintsuki from comment #21)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #20)
> > > It turns out that static PIE with non-zero load address must have ET_EXEC:
> >
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #26 from mintsuki ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #24)
> (In reply to mintsuki from comment #22)
> > As far as I can tell, the linked issue seems to indicate more so that this
> > is indeed a problem rather than some glibc bu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #27 from mintsuki ---
This is the aforementioned other kernel's readelf -d output:
Dynamic section at offset 0x46b70 contains 13 entries:
TagType Name/Value
0x0004 (HASH)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #28 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to mintsuki from comment #25)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #23)
> > (In reply to mintsuki from comment #21)
> > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #20)
> > > > It turns out that static PIE wit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #29 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to mintsuki from comment #27)
> This is the aforementioned other kernel's readelf -d output:
>
>
> Dynamic section at offset 0x46b70 contains 13 entries:
> TagType
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #30 from mintsuki ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #29)
> (In reply to mintsuki from comment #27)
> > This is the aforementioned other kernel's readelf -d output:
> >
> >
> > Dynamic section at offset 0x46b70 contains 13 ent
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #31 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to mintsuki from comment #30)
> Basically, it tries to find a PHDR which contains the RELA section, and if
> it find it, it subtracts the PHDR's virtual address and adds its offset in
> order to find
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #32 from mintsuki ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #31)
> (In reply to mintsuki from comment #30)
> > Basically, it tries to find a PHDR which contains the RELA section, and if
> > it find it, it subtracts the PHDR's virtual a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #33 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to mintsuki from comment #32)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #31)
> > (In reply to mintsuki from comment #30)
> > > Basically, it tries to find a PHDR which contains the RELA section, and if
> >
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #34 from mintsuki ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #33)
> (In reply to mintsuki from comment #32)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #31)
> > > (In reply to mintsuki from comment #30)
> > > > Basically, it tries to find a P
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #35 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to mintsuki from comment #34)
> > The static PIE generated by ldd with non-zero load address won't work with
> > glibc before and after my glibc fix. I will open an lld issue after glibc
> > is fixe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
--- Comment #36 from mintsuki ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #35)
> (In reply to mintsuki from comment #34)
>
> > > The static PIE generated by ldd with non-zero load address won't work with
> > > glibc before and after my glibc fix.
Hello,
I've just spotted a typo in GNU Assembler documentation:
File path: gas/doc/as.texi
line text
---
938 @item --reduce-memory-overheads
939 Ignored. Supported for compatibility with tools that apss the
same option to
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31795
Fangrui Song changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
CC|
22 matches
Mail list logo
