[Bug binutils/31540] objcopy, ELF_SECTION_IN_SEGMENT_1 section to segment mapping seems wrong

2024-04-15 Thread shank.vijay at yandex dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31540 --- Comment #1 from vijay Shankar --- I have a patch suggestion for this issue added check to copy_private_bfd_data so that sections with inconsistent relation between vma and lma go to re-write im not sure how this will affect other cases ma

[Bug binutils/31540] objcopy, ELF_SECTION_IN_SEGMENT_1 section to segment mapping seems wrong

2024-04-15 Thread shank.vijay at yandex dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31540 --- Comment #2 from vijay Shankar --- I have a patch suggestion for this issue added check to copy_private_bfd_data so that sections with inconsistent relation between vma and lma go to re-write im not sure how this will affect other cases ma

Re: Objcopy seems to consider tbss part of PTLOAD

2024-04-15 Thread vijay Shankar
  Raised bugzilla for the same :https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31540updated with suggested patch.Thank you.

Issue 66024 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_objdump_safe: Timeout in fuzz_objdump_safe

2024-04-15 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: Deadline-Approaching Comment #2 on issue 66024 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_objdump_safe: Timeout in fuzz_objdump_safe https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=66024#c2 This bug is approaching its deadline for being fixed, and will be automatically derestri

Issue 65819 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_disassemble: ASSERT: value <= 0x4 && aarch64_get_qualifier_standard_value (qualifier) == value

2024-04-15 Thread sheriffbot via monorail
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit -deadline-approaching Deadline-Exceeded Comment #4 on issue 65819 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_disassemble: ASSERT: value <= 0x4 && aarch64_get_qualifier_standard_value (qualifier) == value https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=65819#

[Bug binutils/31527] gdb is not working for UNC path

2024-04-15 Thread simon.cook at embecosm dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31527 Simon Cook changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #15460|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug binutils/31540] objcopy, ELF_SECTION_IN_SEGMENT_1 section to segment mapping seems wrong

2024-04-15 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31540 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED CC|

[Bug binutils/31540] objcopy, ELF_SECTION_IN_SEGMENT_1 section to segment mapping seems wrong

2024-04-15 Thread shank.vijay at yandex dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31540 --- Comment #4 from vijay Shankar --- > Can you confirm that the patch fixes the problem you initially reported ? Yes, can confirm that the patch does fix the issue Here's section to segment mapping with and without patch without change

[Bug binutils/31540] objcopy, ELF_SECTION_IN_SEGMENT_1 section to segment mapping seems wrong

2024-04-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31540 --- Comment #5 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ccbf42ec88f3e8bbb74dbdc1d6c9da3a9d805cff commit ccbf42ec88f3e8bbb74dbdc1d6c9da3a9d805c

[Bug binutils/31540] objcopy, ELF_SECTION_IN_SEGMENT_1 section to segment mapping seems wrong

2024-04-15 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31540 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug binutils/31540] objcopy, ELF_SECTION_IN_SEGMENT_1 section to segment mapping seems wrong

2024-04-15 Thread shank.vijay at yandex dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31540 --- Comment #7 from vijay Shankar --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #6) > Right - well the patch looks good to me, and did not trigger any problems, > so I have gone ahead and checked it in. Thanks Nick. -- You are receiving this m

[Bug binutils/31527] gdb is not working for UNC path

2024-04-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31527 --- Comment #15 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9dd918142787246ea7ed53494d9cbc6b51486133 commit 9dd918142787246ea7ed53494d9cbc6b51486

[Bug binutils/31527] gdb is not working for UNC path

2024-04-15 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31527 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/31644] New: [Regression] libstdc++prettyprinters/debug.[cc|cxx11.cc] failing to build - linker error

2024-04-15 Thread carlos.seo at linaro dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31644 Bug ID: 31644 Summary: [Regression] libstdc++prettyprinters/debug.[cc|cxx11.cc] failing to build - linker error Product: binutils Version: 2.43 (HEAD)

[Bug ld/31644] [Regression] libstdc++prettyprinters/debug.[cc|cxx11.cc] failing to build - linker error

2024-04-15 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31644 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug ld/31644] [Regression] libstdc++prettyprinters/debug.[cc|cxx11.cc] failing to build - linker error

2024-04-15 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31644 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug ld/31644] [Regression] libstdc++prettyprinters/debug.[cc|cxx11.cc] failing to build - linker error

2024-04-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31644 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0