https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29998
--- Comment #16 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f3d8ae90b23695d86ebf894a4a6b95846007fafd
commit f3d8ae90b23695d86ebf894a4a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29998
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30033
Ard Biesheuvel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ardb at kernel dot org
--
You are r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #4
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30043
Bug ID: 30043
Summary: libgprofng.so.* are installed to a wrong location
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Comp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29998
--- Comment #18 from Jan Janssen ---
Compilation works now and the binary will run, but I get a miscompilation(?)
wrt popcount builtin.
Both cases are based on https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/26097, where I
originally encountered them
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29521
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Mezentsev
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b1a41f59270a4efd57e354e46ab735eb163c66ca
commit b1a41f59270a4efd57e35
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29521
--- Comment #5 from Ruud van der Pas ---
To further clarify this patch, we now use special controls in the gprofng.texi
user guide file to generate the gprofng.1 man page. This eliminates the
dependence on help2man to create this page.
The ot
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30046
Bug ID: 30046
Summary: power cmpi leads to unknown architecture
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ga
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30046
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-linux
--
You are receiving
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30046
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
configured with
~/src/binutils-gdb/configure \
--disable-nls \
--disable-gdb --disable-gdbserver --disable-gdbsupport --disable-gprofng \
--disable-libbacktrace --disable-libdecnumber --disable-readline --dis
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30043
Vladimir Mezentsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #1 from Vlad
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30036
Vladimir Mezentsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-01-25
Ever confirmed|0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28824
--- Comment #20 from Alan Modra ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #19)
> It might be even better to put the SHT_NOBITS padding on the header before the
> relro segment.
No, that can't work. Since the end of the relro segment must end o
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28824
--- Comment #21 from Rui Ueyama ---
How about splitting the .got section into two, one is for the first three words
and the other for the rest of .got and then place the first one in a relro
segment? It would be much easier to do than carefull
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28824
--- Comment #22 from Fangrui Song ---
> [...] (psykose/alice confirmed lld does not have the problem on alpine, but I
> am not sure if they do the correct thing™ here security-wise -- it's good to
> have a concrete idea here)
lld does the c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #5 from cqwrteur ---
nope. none of them work. I can only make it work with lld.
it does not work when the code dynamically linked with libstdc++
Probably it is the latest patch on GCC that changes the win32 thread model
causes the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
cqwrteur changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com
--
You are r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #6 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #5)
> Created attachment 14622 [details]
> C249694B8E474FF2AE570A876F184D45.png
>
> nope. none of them work. I can only make it work with lld.
> it does not work when the cod
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28824
--- Comment #23 from Alan Modra ---
(In reply to Rui Ueyama from comment #21)
> How about splitting the .got section into two
The .got.plt actually (which on x86_64 GNU ld is the section having 3 reserved
entries then the R_X86_64_JUMP_SLOT en
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #6)
> Hi jwakely, I do not know whether it is an issue that relates to win32
> thread model of libstdc++ or it is the issue with gnu ld. Can you
> investigate it for me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #8 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #6)
> > Hi jwakely, I do not know whether it is an issue that relates to win32
> > thread model of libstdc++ or it is the issue
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #9 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #6)
> > Hi jwakely, I do not know whether it is an issue that relates to win32
> > thread model of libstdc++ or it is the issue
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jwakely.gcc at gmail dot com |
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29973
--- Comment #10 from cqwrteur ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #4)
> Hi cqwrteur,
>
> I am afraid that we are going to need some more information before we can
> get to the bottom of this issue. For example:
>
> * What is the
26 matches
Mail list logo
