[Bug ld/27566] [RISC-V] relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against aymbol

2021-04-19 Thread nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27566 Nelson Chu changed: What|Removed |Added Target||riscv*-*-* -- You are receiving this ma

[Bug gas/27215] as: Error: non-constant .uleb128 is not supported on riscv64

2021-04-19 Thread nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27215 Nelson Chu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org

[Bug ld/25354] On RISCV64 LD, with EXACTLY 72 headers/sections, PhysAddr for first Program Header is wrong

2021-04-19 Thread nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25354 Nelson Chu changed: What|Removed |Added Target||riscv64-*-* CC|

[Bug ld/25258] RISC-V: relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_GPREL_I against `.LANCHOR2'

2021-04-19 Thread nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25258 Nelson Chu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org --- C

[Bug ld/24676] [RISCV] Redundant R_RISCV_DTPMOD* R_RISCV_DTPREL* resulted from Global Dynamic -> Local Exec relaxation

2021-04-19 Thread nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24676 Nelson Chu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org --- C

[Bug gas/27178] x86-64: Omit _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ for call foo@PLT

2021-04-19 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27178 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 f

[Bug binutils/21702] ar cannot handle (slim) LTO object files when in MRI script mode

2021-04-19 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21702 --- Comment #15 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 13378 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13378&action=edit Proposed patch Ah ha - I think that I have it. Please could you try this uploaded patch ? -- You are r

[Bug binutils/27751] test failure on powerpc-linux-gnu

2021-04-19 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27751 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug gas/27753] New: -mx86-used-note= defaulting to yes regresses

2021-04-19 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27753 Bug ID: 27753 Summary: -mx86-used-note= defaulting to yes regresses Product: binutils Version: 2.36.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Compon

[Bug gas/27753] -mx86-used-note= defaulting to yes regresses

2021-04-19 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27753 Jan Beulich changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86 -- You are receiving this mail bec

[Bug binutils/21702] ar cannot handle (slim) LTO object files when in MRI script mode

2021-04-19 Thread 12f8219 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21702 --- Comment #16 from Pavel <12f8219 at gmail dot com> --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #15) > Created attachment 13378 [details] > Proposed patch > > Ah ha - I think that I have it. Please could you try this uploaded patch ? yep. t

[Bug binutils/21702] ar cannot handle (slim) LTO object files when in MRI script mode

2021-04-19 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21702 --- Comment #17 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=229597a129f62d5e8a101f1eed95489e2399f741 commit 229597a129f62d5e8a101f1eed

[Bug binutils/21702] ar cannot handle (slim) LTO object files when in MRI script mode

2021-04-19 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21702 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/27751] test failure on powerpc-linux-gnu

2021-04-19 Thread efraim at flashner dot co.il
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27751 --- Comment #2 from Efraim Flashner --- On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 02:51:30PM +, nickc at redhat dot com wrote: > Hi Efraim, > > I am unable to reproduce these failures. (As in, when I run the libiberty > testsuite from the 2.36 branch, a

[Bug gas/27753] -mx86-used-note= defaulting to yes regresses

2021-04-19 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27753 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 f

[Bug ld/27755] New: [powerpc] fails to link binary which does not fit within R_PPC_REL24

2021-04-19 Thread rin at NetBSD dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27755 Bug ID: 27755 Summary: [powerpc] fails to link binary which does not fit within R_PPC_REL24 Product: binutils Version: 2.36 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: cri

[Bug ld/27755] [powerpc] fails to link binary which does not fit within R_PPC_REL24

2021-04-19 Thread rin at NetBSD dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27755 Rin Okuyama changed: What|Removed |Added Target||powerpc--netbsd CC|