https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27567
Bug ID: 27567
Summary: Linking PE files adds alignment section flags to
executables
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27567
qsniyg at protonmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qsniyg at protonmail dot
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27566
--- Comment #2 from Nelson Chu ---
Therefore, when we are doing the LUI and PCREL relaxations (GP to symbol or
c.lui to symbol, must cross the DATA_SEGMENT),
* If "-z relro" isn't set, then we need to reserve at most "MAXPAGESIZE" for
the pad
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27566
Nelson Chu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot
org
--- C
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27217
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26395
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||joel.sherrill at oarcorp dot
com
--- C
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27443
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27447
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26395
--- Comment #9 from Joel Sherrill ---
(In reply to Alex Coplan from comment #8)
> *** Bug 27217 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
It may be the same assert but I don't think it is the same trigger. The C code
in that ticket comp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27487
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27487
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com
Eve
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27443
--- Comment #2 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
Hi Nick,
Attached.
Regards,
Dave
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27443
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
dave@mx3210:~/gnu/binutils/objdir/ld$
/home/dave/gnu/binutils/objdir/ld/../binutils/nm-new --plugin
/home/dave/opt/test/libexec/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/10.0.0/liblto_plugin.so
tmpdir/pr25355.o > dump.out
da
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27226
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|mjw at fedoraproject dot org |
--
You are receiving this ma
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27215
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|mjw at fedoraproject dot org |mark at klomp dot org
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27487
--- Comment #3 from Fangrui Song ---
Hi Nick, thanks for the patch! --format=just-symbols and -j look good to me. I
wonder whether it is necessary to reserve -J. -J can probably be used for other
purposes.
--
You are receiving this mail beca
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27443
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
I see the same incorrect 'T' for these variables using a gcc-8.8.1
cross-compiler.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27443
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
OK, tracing this through a little, in bfd_plugin_canonicalize_symtab I see
current_plugin->has_symbol_type is zero for me. This looks to be a case of my
hppa-linux-gcc lto plugin using the old LDPT_ADD_SYMBO
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27443
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
19 matches
Mail list logo
