[Bug gas/26253] Support SHF_LINK_ORDER with sh_link=0

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26253 --- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b71702f1c01052b70b4fd8157982eadc2132fc24 commit b71702f1c01052b70b4fd815798

[Bug gas/26253] Support SHF_LINK_ORDER with sh_link=0

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26253 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/26705] MODRM isn't properly handled

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26705 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0e9f3bf12616b108682bb6f6e2a5ef04df9586a8 commit 0e9f3bf12616b108682bb6f6e2a5ef04

[Bug binutils/26704] Missing the 'l' suffix for sysret in 64-bit mode

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26704 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=5b316d90e4ec9845a890fd21ad86cf1043fb2ca3 commit 5b316d90e4ec9845a890fd21ad86cf10

[Bug binutils/26704] Missing the 'l' suffix for sysret in 64-bit mode

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26704 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.36 Resolution|---

[Bug binutils/26705] MODRM isn't properly handled

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26705 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug gas/26694] gas x86-32: "can't handle non absolute segment in `lcall'" (or `ljmp')

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26694 --- Comment #11 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6d96a5946d1ec76fea79bc36aa95d7d3dd304200 commit 6d96a5946d1ec76fea79bc36aa95d7d

[Bug gas/26694] gas x86-32: "can't handle non absolute segment in `lcall'" (or `ljmp')

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26694 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Target Milestone|---

Re: [PATCH] Fix typos

Hi Samanta, Thanks very much for telling us about these typos. I have now applied your patch. Cheers Nick

[Bug binutils/26698] out of bounds access in mc_unify_path

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug binutils/26698] out of bounds access in mc_unify_path

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/26698] out of bounds access in mc_unify_path

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26698 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1f1845d435fd0886f5c5561df8922268d2dfaefc commit 1f1845d435fd0886f5c5561df89

[Bug ld/26701] Ability to suppress warnings due to tags in a library

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26701 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Eyal, Yes, the linker could suppress these warnings. But the important point is that it is not at all clear that the linker should suppress them. The warnings are important, and the real way to g

Re: [Bug ld/26701] New: Ability to suppress warnings due to tags in a library

Hi Eyal, Yes, the linker could suppress these warnings. But the important point is that it is not at all clear that the linker should suppress them. The warnings are important, and the real way to get rid of them is to fix the code that is triggering them. Now I appreciate that this is

[Bug ld/26701] Ability to suppress warnings due to tags in a library

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26701 --- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) > Yes, the linker could suppress these warnings. But the important point > is that it is not at all clear that the linker should suppress them. Oh, but of

[Bug ld/26706] New: pad strings in .dynstr

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26706 Bug ID: 26706 Summary: pad strings in .dynstr Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assigne

[Bug ld/26706] pad strings in .dynstr

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26706 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mark at klomp dot org -- You are rec

[Bug ld/26701] Ability to suppress warnings due to tags in a library

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26701 --- Comment #3 from Kib --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) > there are several ways to work around the problem without > modifying the linker. My stance is: why introduce new code, and > potentially new bugs, to the linker

[Bug binutils/26707] binutils on mingw-w64 for x86_64-elf target because of bison flex?

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26707 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-elf Host|

[Bug binutils/26707] New: binutils on mingw-w64 for x86_64-elf target because of bison flex?

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26707 Bug ID: 26707 Summary: binutils on mingw-w64 for x86_64-elf target because of bison flex? Product: binutils Version: 2.36 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug binutils/26667] Add powerpc64le-*-freebsd* support (elf64-powerpcle-freebsd)

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26667 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6afcdeb3581e99e2d4ce06d0034c7c47292aeec1 commit 6afcdeb3581e99e2d4ce06d0034c7