https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24564
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=338ba75534fbfeb64d7009f29a89f25826a1f4d2
commit 338ba75534fbfeb64
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24571
--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=7622049e0bef81fab900860400838bc977449892
commit 7622049e0bef81fab
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24571
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24564
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24373
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=739b5c9c778dee9e2f54d864f83a81ecb0639535
commit 739b5c9c778dee9e2f54d864
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24373
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
Hi Julius,
Sorry for the delay, I couldn't find a reasonably feasible way to restart the
linking, so instead I implemented a way to allow users to pick which workaround
to use.
In your case if you use
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24373
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.33
--
You are receiving this mai
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24373
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24559
--- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8fe9a076adf308ec813246a96f915c5ab5b6a75f
commit 8fe9a076adf308e
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24460
Andre Vieira changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24373
--- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina ---
Hmm interesting, didn't receive the error when building inside 32-bit schroot
on AArch64 machine. I'll take a look, thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
Hi 乐泰,
Thank you very much for reporting these bugs. Unfortunately
there are a few problems with this report:
* Bugs related to demangling in cplus-dem.c should actually
be reported to the GCC project, not the BINUTILS project.
This is because cplus-dem.c is part of the libiberty
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24557
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24576
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24373
--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6467207116c66ff2c58f8bc35cb15b2596f5c457
commit 6467207116c66ff2c58f8bc3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24373
--- Comment #9 from Julius Werner ---
Hi Tamar,
Thanks for taking care of this! I think it's a good solution that should be
sufficient in practice. The kinds of binaries where an extra 4KB is a big deal
should not be larger than 1MB anyway. F
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24557
--- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1)
> Please try asking the GCC folks first, but if that fails, please reopen this
> PR.
Have filed:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90566
for now. Th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24576
--- Comment #2 from Julius Werner ---
Created attachment 11789
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11789&action=edit
proposed fix
Hi Nick,
Okay, I looked into it and I think I found a reasonably clean way to do it
(just c
18 matches
Mail list logo