https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23460
--- Comment #11 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Evangelos Foutras from comment #10)
Hi Evangelos,
> Is it possible to avoid calling dlclose() on the plugin handle?
I have to say that I am not really liking this idea...
> I'm asking
> b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23460
--- Comment #12 from Michał Górny ---
Nick, can you think of any issues with building the plugin with
-Wl,-z,nodelete? I'm wondering binutils plugin API in particular.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23460
--- Comment #13 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Michał Górny from comment #12)
> Nick, can you think of any issues with building the plugin with
> -Wl,-z,nodelete? I'm wondering binutils plugin API in particular.
There are none that I can
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23526
Bug ID: 23526
Summary: 32-bit address can be encoded with addr32 prefix
Product: binutils
Version: 2.32 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Compo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23460
--- Comment #14 from Evangelos Foutras ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #11)
> I just do not like the idea of not tidying up after ourselves. Mind you it
> is only linker plugins that call dlclose. Plugins for other tools (eg ar,
>
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23526
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23527
Bug ID: 23527
Summary: regression (ld-2.30 worked): relocation R_X86_64_PC32
against protected symbol `a' can not be used when
making a shared object
Product: binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23527
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Binutils target is x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binut
