[Bug ld/18954] New: LTO drops weak binding with "ld -r"

2015-09-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18954 Bug ID: 18954 Summary: LTO drops weak binding with "ld -r" Product: binutils Version: 2.26 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld

[Bug ld/18954] LTO drops weak binding with "ld -r"

2015-09-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18954 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/15323] Unable to redefine weak function in -flto incrementally-linked executable

2015-09-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15323 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=6d636d8c779d3be92dd5db021d12c2e3a2c5d419 commit 6d636d8c779d3be92dd5db021d12c2e3

Re: Off-by-one error in ld documentation

2015-09-11 Thread Hans-Peter Nilsson
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Mark Rages wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Nick Clifton wrote: > > Hi Hans-Peter, > > > >> Nicely, thanks. While there's a point in keeping just one > >> version for simplicity, the educational point of "here's what > >> you may write which doesn't work, here's the s

Re: Off-by-one error in ld documentation

2015-09-11 Thread Mark Rages
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Nick Clifton wrote: > Hi Hans-Peter, > >> Nicely, thanks. While there's a point in keeping just one >> version for simplicity, the educational point of "here's what >> you may write which doesn't work, here's the semantically >> corrected code, and this is what you