[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries

2009-11-18 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-18 09:14 --- Hi Chris, > On another note, do you have any tricks to make me feel confident we aren't > introducing bugs? Tricks no. But the newly patched disassembler does not introduce any regressions into the GAS testsuite

[Bug gold/10949] output.cc fails with outpu t.cc:3509: error: format ‘%llx’ expec ts type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argumen t 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’

2009-11-18 Thread thestig at google dot com
--- Additional Comments From thestig at google dot com 2009-11-18 11:10 --- Created an attachment (id=4393) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4393&action=view) Use PRIx64 instead. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10949 --- You are receiving

ar: undefined symbol: bfd_plugin_set_program_name

2009-11-18 Thread david levis
I find such a problem when cross compile binutils 2.20; the following are logs in terminal: libtool: link: ar cru .libs/libbfd.a archive.o archures.o bfd.o bfdio.o bfdwin.o cache.o coffgen.o corefile.o format.o init.o libbfd.o opncls.o reloc.o section.o syms.o targets.o hash.o linker.o srec.o bi

[Bug ld/9863] FAIL: Weak symbols in dynamic objects 1 (main test)

2009-11-18 Thread tschwinge at gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From tschwinge at gnu dot org 2009-11-18 15:42 --- I was just hit by the same error. Matthias' patch has been OKed for HEAD, and the 2.20 branch, but, as it seems to me, only been committed to the 2.20 branch, but not on HEAD: revision 1.18.8.1 date: 2009/09/30

[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries

2009-11-18 Thread drow at sources dot redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From drow at sources dot redhat dot com 2009-11-18 16:14 --- Hi Nick, Thoms Schwinge noticed a failure in group-relocations.d: regexp_diff match failure regexp "^8074: e1c020d0ldrdr2, \[r0\]$" line "8074: e1c020d0

[Bug binutils/10973] OP_E_memory produces wrong disassembled code

2009-11-18 Thread hjl dot tools at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-11-18 16:35 --- Those are bugs in FMA4 and XOP patches. -- What|Removed |Added CC|

Re: [Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries

2009-11-18 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Daniel, Thoms Schwinge noticed a failure in group-relocations.d: regexp_diff match failure regexp "^8074: e1c020d0ldrdr2, \[r0\]$" line "8074: e1c020d0ldrdr2, [r0, #0]" Oops, I thought that I had caught all of these. Is this change

[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries

2009-11-18 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2009-11-18 17:07 --- Subject: Re: Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries Hi Daniel, > Thoms Schwinge noticed a failure in group-relocations.d: > > regexp_diff match failure > regexp "^8074: e1c020d0

[Bug gold/10979] New: Crashes during

2009-11-18 Thread robert dot wohlrab at gmx dot de
I tried to recompile all packages in Debian and found different packages which dont work with binutils-gold. Interesting for you are currently arj, idjc, klibc and libtirpc because they create internal crashes which get caught by it (so no segfaults but still crashes): Output of each lin: cc -DLOC

[Bug gold/10979] Crashes during linking of program

2009-11-18 Thread robert dot wohlrab at gmx dot de
-- What|Removed |Added Summary|Crashes during |Crashes during linking of ||program http://sourceware.org/bugzi

[Bug gold/10980] New: Please support more options available from old ld

2009-11-18 Thread robert dot wohlrab at gmx dot de
I rebuild the whole debian archive and noticed that many programs don't build because gold doesn't support special operations. Is it possible to support more of them? Some are maybe completely useless or used in a wrong. Please add only add a information for them so I can forward the information to

[Bug binutils/10924] Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries

2009-11-18 Thread chris at seberino dot org
--- Additional Comments From chris at seberino dot org 2009-11-18 18:17 --- Subject: Re: Bug in objdump when disassembling raw armv4t binaries On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 05:07:14PM -, nickc at redhat dot com wrote: > Actually I think that he was referring to the compulsory pre

[Bug gold/10949] output.cc fails with outpu t.cc:3509: error: format ‘%llx’ expec ts type ‘long long unsigned int’, but argumen t 2 has type ‘long unsigned int’

2009-11-18 Thread thestig at google dot com
-- What|Removed |Added CC||thestig at google dot com http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10949 --- You are receiving this

[Bug binutils/10973] OP_E_memory produces wrong disassembled code

2009-11-18 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-18 20:01 --- Yes these are problems linked to how FMA4 and XOP are using OP_E_memory. I am working on a patch to fix these problems. Sebastian -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10973 --- You are re

[Bug gold/10980] Please support more options available from old ld

2009-11-18 Thread robert dot wohlrab at gmx dot de
--- Additional Comments From robert dot wohlrab at gmx dot de 2009-11-18 20:04 --- I think following list includes most of the packages with missing linker flags 3 ld: -G: unknown option * java3d * qdbm * osmo 1 ld: -fpic: unknown option * cyclades-serial-client 1 ld: -fPIC: un

[Bug gold/10982] New: objcopy brings 'invalid operation' when adding debug link section

2009-11-18 Thread robert dot wohlrab at gmx dot de
>From Debian bug: Matthias Klose wrote: [] > > `debian/sauerbraten-dbg/usr/lib/debug//usr/lib/games/sauerbraten/sauer_cl > >ient': Invalid operation dh_strip: objcopy returned exit code 1 > > > > Is this a known problem with binutils-gold? > > yes, I did see this as well recently. Could it be

[Bug gold/10982] objcopy brings 'invalid operation' when adding debug link section

2009-11-18 Thread doko at debian dot org
--- Additional Comments From doko at debian dot org 2009-11-19 02:00 --- unsure if this really is a binutils/gold bug; it's only seen in Debian unstable with a recent glibc upload. not in testing or Ubuntu. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10982 --- You are rec

Re: ar: undefined symbol: bfd_plugin_set_program_name

2009-11-18 Thread Alan Modra
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 01:37:55AM -0800, david levis wrote: > ar: symbol lookup error: ar: undefined symbol: bfd_plugin_set_program_name Please show the options you passed to configure. -- Alan Modra Australia Development Lab, IBM ___ bug-binutils m

[Bug gold/10980] Please support more options available from old ld

2009-11-18 Thread ian at airs dot com
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2009-11-19 07:01 --- Thanks for the extensive list. Just a couple of notes: > ld: --warn-constructors: unknown option This one is implemented in the development version. > ld: -combreloc: unknown -z option This is a bug in the package.

[Bug ld/9863] FAIL: Weak symbols in dynamic objects 1 (main test)

2009-11-18 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-19 07:01 --- Subject: Bug 9863 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: amo...@sourceware.org 2009-11-19 07:01:40 Modified files: ld : ChangeLog ld/emulparams : ar

[Bug binutils/10973] OP_E_memory produces wrong disassembled code

2009-11-18 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-19 07:09 --- Subject: Bug 10973 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: s...@sourceware.org 2009-11-19 07:08:40 Modified files: gas/testsuite : ChangeLog gas/testsuite/gas/

[Bug ld/9863] FAIL: Weak symbols in dynamic objects 1 (main test)

2009-11-18 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-11-19 07:10 --- . -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug binutils/10973] OP_E_memory produces wrong disassembled code

2009-11-18 Thread spop at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From spop at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-19 07:10 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug gold/10670] gold doesn't implement ld -x

2009-11-18 Thread esigra at gmail dot com
-- What|Removed |Added CC||esigra at gmail dot com http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10670 --- You are receiving this m