--
What|Removed |Added
OtherBugsDependingO||2251
nThis||
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2218
--
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-01-31 19:11 ---
An updated patch is posted at
http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-01/msg00224.html
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2218
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC
If I add a local symbol to the symbol table, and then a relocation relative to
it ld seg faults when I try to
link it. If I change it to a global symbol all is well. (ld -r test.o seg
faults as well)
Is is the expected behaviour (well, not the seg fault, but at least not
handling relocation r
--- Additional Comments From plalonde at neoptica dot com 2006-02-01 01:46
---
Created an attachment (id=855)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=855&action=view)
.tgz with success.o and fail.o
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2254
--- You ar
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 01:13:32PM +, Nick Clifton wrote:
> Yes - this is the heart of the matter. What is happening is that you
> are attempting to add a section that already exists. The old (RH9)
> binutils silently allowed this, which was incorrect.
Wait... why? There's no restriction
--- Additional Comments From plalonde at neoptica dot com 2006-02-01 03:52
---
fail.o is incorrect; the symtab entry's info field is wrong.
That said, I'll leave the bug open so the seg fault can be addressed.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2254
--- You are r
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 01:09:56AM +1100, John Pye wrote:
> > /usr/bin/ld: BFD 2.15.94.0.2.2 20041220 internal error, aborting at
> > ../../bfd/cache.c line 495 in bfd_cache_lookup_worker
> >
> > /usr/bin/ld: Please report this bug.
FYI, this abort is no longer present in current versions. It use
