hi,
i am using the msp430-as assembler with -mmcu=msp430x147. the above
controller has a code address space from 0x8000. but whenever i
include ".org 0x8000" at the beginning of the code and follow it with
a mov command like mov #0x5A80,0x0120, i get the output "operand out
of range: 32784 (or a
Hi,
I have few questions about following code,
.set tuv, 1
.long tuv
.set tuv, _undef+2
.long tuv
For first .long the symbol tuv evaluates to 1. But for second it is just 2,
relocation
information for _undef is not generated in ELF
Hi,
Please let me know where can I report GNU Assembler bugs.
Thanks in advance.
Best Reagrds,
Jaydeep
Jaydeep S. Patil
Samsung Electronics Co, Ltd.
System SW Lab
San #24 Nongseo-Ri, Giheung-Eup
Yongin-City, Gyeonggi-Do,
Korea 449-711
O: +82-31-209-9975
R: +82-
PatilSubhash Jayadeep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Please let me know where can I report GNU Assembler bugs.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/
Ian
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
binutils-2.15 does not compile in 64bit mode due to the fact that, starting in
AIX5.2, in 64bit, we do not support the old format of vm-info and core-dump.
I made changes in bfd/rs6000-core.c that I can provide you with, basically
#ifdef ing out the references to the "old" part of the core-dump and
--- Additional Comments From jsworley at qwest dot net 2005-04-08 16:56
---
One other note: GCC (at least) can issue a .bbb bundle where
the first two branches are NOPs. This case should be
converted to
{ .mlx
nop
--
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=834
---
--- Additional Comments From drow at sources dot redhat dot com 2005-04-08
17:33 ---
Already fixed in CVS and for 2.16.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 179 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From drow at sources dot redhat dot com 2005-04-08
17:33 ---
*** Bug 824 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
Hi,
I am using GNU assembler 2.15 (on WIN 2000)
I have few questions about ".set" pseudo op-code
Please check with following codes.
1)
.set tuv, 1
.long tuv
.set tuv, _undef+2
.long tuv
In above case first .long evaluates to .long 1
But in second .long no relocation
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-04-09
03:41 ---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 827 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-04-09
03:41 ---
*** Bug 836 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
11 matches
Mail list logo