[Bug ld/831] Get assert in ld

2005-04-07 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2005-04-07 07:03 --- Fixed in 2.16 / mainline, I think. Would you check by downloading and compiling a recent snapshot, please? -- What|Removed |Added -

binutils build broken on Solaris 8

2005-04-07 Thread Roland Lengfeldner
Hello, I just try to build binutils-050406 on Solaris 8, with the following configuration: (cd build_bin; ../binutils-050406/configure --prefix=${GCC_DIR}/gcc_400/${ARCH} --disable-nls) (cd build_bin; make) and the build process brings the following error: make[3]: Entering directory `/home

Re: binutils build broken on Solaris 8

2005-04-07 Thread Roland Lengfeldner
Hi Nick, > Hi Roland, > > > In file included from ../../binutils-050406/binutils/size.c:32: > > ../../binutils-050406/binutils/bucomm.h:144: warning: `textdomain' > redefined > > ../intl/libintl.h:171: warning: this is the location of the previous > > definition > > > Is there in general a probl

Re: binutils build broken on Solaris 8

2005-04-07 Thread Roland Lengfeldner
Hi Nick, > Hi Roland, > > > Another question, I just receive another email regarding > > that I post to a member-only list. I didn't know that before, how can I > > change it? > > If you surf to: > >http://sources.redhat.com/binutils/ > > You will find a section about halfway down where yo

[Bug ld/834] New: IA64: Change br to brl for "far" branches when possible

2005-04-07 Thread jsworley at qwest dot net
This suggestion owes much to David Mosberger Currently, when the loader detects that a branch symbol is beyond the 16MB range of the 25-bit IP-relative branch (br), it adds a trampoline bundle with a 64-bit IP-relative branch (brl). This construct, however, is likely to incur a branch miss penalty