[Bug gprof/32779] New: tst-gmon-gprof-l.sh failure when -g isn't used

2025-03-11 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32779 Bug ID: 32779 Summary: tst-gmon-gprof-l.sh failure when -g isn't used Product: binutils Version: 2.45 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug gprof/32779] tst-gmon-gprof-l.sh failure when -g isn't used

2025-03-10 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32779 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receivi

[Bug gprof/13993] gprof failed to accumulate hist time

2025-03-08 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13993 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

2025-03-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug gprof/32768] New: tst-gmon failure on x86_64

2025-03-08 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 Bug ID: 32768 Summary: tst-gmon failure on x86_64 Product: binutils Version: 2.45 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprof

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

2025-03-08 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sat Mar 8 17:13:17 2025 +0800 gprof: Compile tst-gmon.c with -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer Compile tst-gmon.c with -O2 -fno-omit-frame-pointer to ensure proper call graph generation. PR gprof/32768 * configure.ac: Compile tst-gmon.c with

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

2025-03-08 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra --- The fixed patch you posted to the mailing list works for me. The one attached here does not due to lack of -O2 when compiling tst-gmon.c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for t

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

2025-03-08 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

2025-03-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #0) > Disassembly of f1 and f2 shows the expected calls are there, it's just > that gprof miscategorises the f2->f1 call as f1->f1. > > 00

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

2025-03-08 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

2025-03-08 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- $ gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -fcf-protection=none -fno-pie -pg -g -O1 -c -o tst-gmon.o /home/alan/src/binutils-virgin/gprof/testsuite/tst-gmon.c $ gcc -pg -g -O1 -o tst-gmon nop.o nop.o nop.o nop.o nop.o nop.o

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

2025-03-08 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Oh, sorry, the system compiler also needs -fno-pie -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

2025-03-08 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- The compiler was one I built a while ago, (GCC) 15.0.0 20241022. I don't think it matters very much, you just need to compile to fairly small functions. My default system gcc Ubuntu 13.3.0-6ubuntu2~24.04 wi

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

2025-03-08 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab --- That's because _gmonparam.froms is an array of unsigned long. It used to be unsigned short in the orignal gmon implementation. But even the BSD implementation assumes a function alignment of 4 for x86.

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

2025-03-07 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Which compiler was used? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprof/32768] tst-gmon failure on x86_64

2025-03-07 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32768 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu CC|

[Bug gprof/32764] glibc gmon test failures with binutils trunk's gprof changes (b8189cf9e40bd90502c9a2ce0df39dd54419bea4)

2025-03-07 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri Mar 7 06:42:18 2025 +0800 gprof: Copy a simple test from glibc Copy a simple gprof test from glibc to test the basic gprof functionality. 1. Tested natively on Linux/x86-64 and Linux/i686. 2. Tested for the x86_64-solaris cross target without cross

[Bug gprof/32764] glibc gmon test failures with binutils trunk's gprof changes (b8189cf9e40bd90502c9a2ce0df39dd54419bea4)

2025-03-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Author: H.J. Lu Date: Fri Mar 7 13:55:06 2025 +0800 gprof: Update PR gprof/32764 test 1. Remove gmon.out first before generating it in the configure check. 2. Make tst-gmon-gprof.out depend on the gprof binary. 3. Check that gmon.out is non-empty. 4. Don't include i

[Bug gprof/32764] glibc gmon test failures with binutils trunk's gprof changes (b8189cf9e40bd90502c9a2ce0df39dd54419bea4)

2025-03-06 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
|RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Sam James --- Fixed by: commit d0bcc49443f44cb47a9c0da11bd1fff4f85296de Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu Mar 6 15:30:54 2025 +0800 Revert "gprof: only process line numbers for intersection of vmas and histograms" This reve

[Bug gprof/32764] glibc gmon test failures with binutils trunk's gprof changes (b8189cf9e40bd90502c9a2ce0df39dd54419bea4)

2025-03-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu Mar 6 15:30:54 2025 +0800 Revert "gprof: only process line numbers for intersection of vmas and histograms" This reverts commit b8189cf9e40bd90502c9a2ce0df39dd54419bea4 to fix PR gprof/32764: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg

[Bug gprof/32764] glibc gmon test failures with binutils trunk's gprof changes (b8189cf9e40bd90502c9a2ce0df39dd54419bea4)

2025-03-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32764 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- This change: diff --git a/gprof/gprof.c b/gprof/gprof.c index 9392575f747..d1cbf25fa28 100644 --- a/gprof/gprof.c +++ b/gprof/gprof.c @@ -527,17 +527,6 @@ This program is free software. This program has

[Bug gprof/32765] [2.45 Regression] FAIL: gmon/tst-gmon-gprof

2025-03-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32765 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprof/32764] glibc gmon test failures with binutils trunk's gprof changes (b8189cf9e40bd90502c9a2ce0df39dd54419bea4)

2025-03-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32764 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 f

[Bug gprof/32765] New: [2.45 Regression] FAIL: gmon/tst-gmon-gprof

2025-03-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32765 Bug ID: 32765 Summary: [2.45 Regression] FAIL: gmon/tst-gmon-gprof Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component

[Bug gprof/32764] gmon test failures

2025-03-05 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
|--- |2.45 Component|libc|gprof --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- This regressed with binutils commit: commit b8189cf9e40bd90502c9a2ce0df39dd54419bea4 (HEAD) Author: Richard Allen Date: Sun Feb 16 16:50:05 2025 -0600 gprof: only process line

[Bug gprof/32764] glibc gmon test failures with binutils trunk's gprof changes (b8189cf9e40bd90502c9a2ce0df39dd54419bea4)

2025-03-05 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
failures |glibc gmon test failures ||with binutils trunk's gprof ||changes ||(b8189cf9e40bd90502c9a

[Bug gprof/32224] Call graph not displayed for coff-go32 (no function-flag on symbols)

2024-09-29 Thread jwjagersma at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32224 --- Comment #1 from jwjagersma at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 15724 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15724&action=edit proposed patch Attached patch restores the call graph. But maybe these function-symbols are

[Bug gprof/32224] New: Call graph not displayed for coff-go32 (no function-flag on symbols)

2024-09-29 Thread jwjagersma at gmail dot com
: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprof Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: jwjagersma at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- I'm looking to fix djgpp's profiler support, which is suffering from some bit-rot. I fixed some issues with

[Bug gprof/30657] gprof heap buffer overflow

2023-07-26 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30657 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug gprof/30657] gprof heap buffer overflow

2023-07-25 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
477c9f2ba26ccd77016f2c97941fc8b35e332e35 Author: Alan Modra Date: Wed Jul 26 09:54:03 2023 +0930 PR30657, gprof heap buffer overflow PR 30657 * cg_arcs.c (cg_assemble): Sanity check find_call addresses. * i386.c (i386_find_call): Don't access past end of core_text_

[Bug gprof/30657] gprof heap buffer overflow

2023-07-24 Thread mengda2020 at iscas dot ac.cn
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30657 --- Comment #4 from 陈孟达 --- Sorry, I forgot to attach the file gmon.out. And now the file gmon.out is attached. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprof/30657] gprof heap buffer overflow

2023-07-24 Thread mengda2020 at iscas dot ac.cn
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30657 --- Comment #3 from 陈孟达 --- Created attachment 15005 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15005&action=edit gmon.out -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprof/30657] gprof heap buffer overflow

2023-07-20 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30657 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- missing gmon.out file? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprof/30657] gprof heap buffer overflow

2023-07-20 Thread mengda2020 at iscas dot ac.cn
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30657 --- Comment #1 from 陈孟达 --- Created attachment 14990 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14990&action=edit PoC file(The system let me to re-attach the file). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug gprof/30657] New: gprof heap buffer overflow

2023-07-20 Thread mengda2020 at iscas dot ac.cn
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30657 Bug ID: 30657 Summary: gprof heap buffer overflow Product: binutils Version: 2.39 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprof

[Bug gprof/30532] SEGV in symtab_finalize

2023-06-09 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30532 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gprof/30532] New: SEGV in symtab_finalize

2023-06-09 Thread mengda2020 at iscas dot ac.cn
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30532 Bug ID: 30532 Summary: SEGV in symtab_finalize Product: binutils Version: 2.39 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprof

[Bug gprof/29100] Buffer overflow when read function mapping file

2023-05-13 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29100 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gprof/30324] gprof SEGV out-of-bound read bug

2023-04-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30324 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprof/30324] gprof SEGV out-of-bound read bug

2023-04-11 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
91496180eba5150fb169c5edaff16877eefae7f9 Author: Nick Clifton Date: Tue Apr 11 16:22:28 2023 +0100 Fix an illegal memorty access when running gprof over corrupt data. PR 30324 * symtab.c (symtab_finalize): Only change the end address if dst has been updated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You

[Bug gprof/30324] gprof SEGV out-of-bound read bug

2023-04-11 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30324 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-04-11 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug gprof/30324] New: gprof SEGV out-of-bound read bug

2023-04-07 Thread mengda2020 at iscas dot ac.cn
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30324 Bug ID: 30324 Summary: gprof SEGV out-of-bound read bug Product: binutils Version: 2.39 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprof

[Bug gprof/29627] The help document of gprof misses some options

2022-09-29 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29627 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolu

[Bug gprof/29627] The help document of gprof misses some options

2022-09-29 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
55b0ce4403e29e5c5295bc26024281c62e10ca3c Author: Nick Clifton Date: Thu Sep 29 13:12:37 2022 +0100 Add -B to the help output from gprof, and add suitable documentation. PR 29627 * gprof.c (usage): Add -B. * gprof.texi (synopsis): Add -B. (Output Options): Add entry for

[Bug gprof/29627] New: The help document of gprof misses some options

2022-09-28 Thread mengda2020 at iscas dot ac.cn
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29627 Bug ID: 29627 Summary: The help document of gprof misses some options Product: binutils Version: 2.39 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2

[Bug gprof/29100] Buffer overflow when read function mapping file

2022-08-16 Thread yguoaz at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29100 yguoaz at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |--- Status|RESOL

[Bug gprof/29100] Buffer overflow when read function mapping file

2022-08-16 Thread yguoaz at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29100 --- Comment #2 from yguoaz at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1) > The calculation would need to overflow a size_t, not an int. Hi, sizeof(size_t) == sizeof(int) may hold in certain platforms (e.g., a 32 bit machine). I

[Bug gprof/29100] Buffer overflow when read function mapping file

2022-08-16 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29100 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprof/17102] Gprof of a multi threaded program using Boost::Signal2 produces an incomplete or wrong profile.

2022-08-03 Thread leo at yuriev dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17102 Leo Yuriev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leo at yuriev dot ru --- Comment #1 from

[Bug gprof/12020] gprof time accumulation problem in win32

2022-08-03 Thread leo at yuriev dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12020 Leo Yuriev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leo at yuriev dot ru --- Comment #1 from

[Bug gprof/22549] Gprof prints an empty profile including no data

2022-08-03 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22549 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gprof/21189] gprof doesn't work with code built with PIE

2022-08-02 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21189 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug gprof/21189] gprof doesn't work with code built with PIE

2022-08-02 Thread leo at yuriev dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21189 --- Comment #5 from Leo Yuriev --- (In reply to Leo Yuriev from comment #4) > I was affected by this problem. So (maybe) I'll figure something out. > Please kick me if you have any new information. > > Rgs. Looking into the source code, I f

[Bug gprof/22549] Gprof prints an empty profile including no data

2022-08-02 Thread leo at yuriev dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22549 Leo Yuriev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leo at yuriev dot ru --- Comment #4 from

[Bug gprof/21189] gprof doesn't work with code built with PIE

2022-07-28 Thread leo at yuriev dot ru
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21189 Leo Yuriev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||leo at yuriev dot ru --- Comment #4 from

[Bug binutils/27693] Gprof (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 ,stack overflow occured when call the function "demangle_path"

2022-06-21 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27693 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.36.1 |2.36 -- You are receiving this mail bec

[Bug gprof/25340] Nevas Tech

2022-06-21 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25340 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Version|pre-2.12|pre-2.15 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug gprof/25314] Duplicate Shares

2022-06-21 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25314 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Version|pre-2.12|pre-2.15 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug gprof/29100] Buffer overflow when read function mapping file

2022-04-28 Thread yguoaz at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29100 yguoaz at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at sourceware dot org --

[Bug gprof/29100] Buffer overflow when read function mapping file

2022-04-28 Thread yguoaz at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29100 yguoaz at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at sources dot redhat.com

[Bug gprof/29100] New: Buffer overflow when read function mapping file

2022-04-28 Thread yguoaz at gmail dot com
Component: gprof Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: yguoaz at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- In the file gprof/corefile.c, the function read_function_mappings has the following code: (link:https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blob;f=gprof

[Bug gprof/28962] libcollector: Error: invalid attempt to declare external version name as default in symbol `posix_spawn@@GLIBC_2.15

2022-03-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
f4be26838dc9937a4ae3e9cf4fbec50efd7786a2 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Mon Mar 14 14:46:25 2022 -0700 gprofng: Use symver attribute if available Use symver attribute if available, instead of asm statement, to support LTO build. PR gprof/28962 * libcollector/dispatcher.c (timer_create@@GLIBC_2.3.3

[Bug gprof/28969] gprofng failed to build with GCC 6

2022-03-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
a8b34706ef017a2032a78892a8595d36029f85a3 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue Mar 15 08:52:30 2022 -0700 gprofng: Don't hardcode -Wno-nonnull-compare Use -Wno-nonnull-compare only if it is supported. PR gprof/28969 * libcollector/Makefile.am (AM_CFLAGS): Replace -Wno-nonnull-compare

[Bug gprof/28962] libcollector: Error: invalid attempt to declare external version name as default in symbol `posix_spawn@@GLIBC_2.15

2022-03-16 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28962 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprof/28969] gprofng failed to build with GCC 6

2022-03-16 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28969 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.39 Status|NEW

[Bug gprof/28969] gprofng failed to build with GCC 6

2022-03-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
61a1f2e71118206dd700fc1ddf244b2178bf6610 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue Mar 15 08:56:39 2022 -0700 gprofng: Don't hardcode -Wno-format-truncation/-Wno-switch Use -Wno-format-truncation and -Wno-switch only if they are supported. PR gprof/28969 * configure.ac (GPROFNG_NO_FORMAT_TRUNCATION_C

[Bug gprof/28969] gprofng failed to build with GCC 6

2022-03-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
c5edd3b8847f118bd022c473b126695fb39f6412 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue Mar 15 08:49:01 2022 -0700 gprofng: Define ATTRIBUTE_FALLTHROUGH Define ATTRIBUTE_FALLTHROUGH to __attribute__ ((fallthrough)) only for GCC 7 or above. PR gprof/28969 * common/gp-defs.h (ATTRIBUTE_FALLTHROUGH): New

[Bug gprof/28969] New: gprofng failed to build with GCC 6

2022-03-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28969 Bug ID: 28969 Summary: gprofng failed to build with GCC 6 Product: binutils Version: 2.39 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprof

[Bug gprof/28967] gprofng.info is generated in the source tree

2022-03-15 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28967 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprof/28967] gprofng.info is generated in the source tree

2022-03-15 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
a4eb1b3cf6d12ff997f37eb9272cbe9251efae27 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Mon Mar 14 17:35:52 2022 -0700 gprofng: Don't generate gprofng.info in source Add info-in-builddir to AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS. PR gprof/28967 * doc/Makefile.am (AUTOMAKE_OPTIONS): Add info-in-builddir. * doc/Makefi

[Bug gprof/28968] New: gprofng doesn't build with -Werror=format-security

2022-03-14 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
y: P2 Component: gprof Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com CC: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- I got Print.cc: In function 'int print_one_visible(FILE*, char*, char*, char*, TV

[Bug gprof/28967] New: gprofng.info is generated in the source tree

2022-03-14 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Component: gprof Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com CC: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- [hjl@gnu-tgl-3 x86-binutils]$ git status --ignored gprofng On branch master Your branch is up to date with

[Bug gprof/28966] New: gprofng test failures on Fedora 35

2022-03-14 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28966 Bug ID: 28966 Summary: gprofng test failures on Fedora 35 Product: binutils Version: 2.39 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprof

[Bug gprof/28965] New: jsynprog tests failed on CET enabled x86-64 machines

2022-03-14 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
Component: gprof Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: hjl.tools at gmail dot com CC: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: x86-64 On CET enabled x86-64 machines, I got /usr/bin/javac -d . /export/gnu

[Bug gprof/28962] libcollector: Error: invalid attempt to declare external version name as default in symbol `posix_spawn@@GLIBC_2.15

2022-03-14 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28962 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.37|2.39 (HEAD) Ever confirmed|0

[Bug gprof/28962] libcollector: Error: invalid attempt to declare external version name as default in symbol `posix_spawn@@GLIBC_2.15

2022-03-14 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28962 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Code defining versioned symbols should use the symver attribute to define those symbols when available (when compiling with GCC 10 and later), instead of inline asm, to be compatible wit

[Bug gprof/28962] New: libcollector: Error: invalid attempt to declare external version name as default in symbol `posix_spawn@@GLIBC_2.15

2022-03-14 Thread mliska at suse dot cz
Version: 2.37 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprof Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: mliska at suse dot cz Target Milestone: --- The error happens with: configure --enable-pgo-build=lto

[Bug gprof/4283] update gprof manual with note about GMON_OUT_PREFIX

2021-06-03 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4283 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sources dot redhat.c |amodra at gmail dot com

[Bug gprof/4283] update gprof manual with note about GMON_OUT_PREFIX

2021-06-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
bbd47c1230b3fbc25e6292ea3f2f5d275d4d459a Author: Ben Asselstine Date: Thu Jun 3 21:25:15 2021 +0930 PR4283, update gprof manual with note about GMON_OUT_PREFIX PR 4283 * gprof.texi (Executing): Note GMON_OUT_PREFIX environment variable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug gprof/2587] Failed to build gprof under gmake patched by Apple.

2021-06-03 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2587 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug binutils/27693] Gprof (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 ,stack overflow occured when call the function "demangle_path"

2021-04-14 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27693 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|NEW

[Bug binutils/27693] Gprof (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 ,stack overflow occured when call the function "demangle_path"

2021-04-06 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27693 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-06 CC|

[Bug binutils/27693] Gprof (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 ,stack overflow occured when call the function "demangle_path"

2021-04-03 Thread tromey at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27693 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at sourceware dot org -- You are

[Bug binutils/27693] Gprof (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 ,stack overflow occured when call the function "demangle_path"

2021-04-03 Thread 2243829852 at qq dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27693 --- Comment #3 from whl <2243829852 at qq dot com> --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #1) > $ c++filt _RIMBALO_suB_I__Z5printi > Segmentation fault (core dumped) OK,I know you meanning,very thank you! -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug binutils/27693] Gprof (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 ,stack overflow occured when call the function "demangle_path"

2021-04-03 Thread 2243829852 at qq dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27693 --- Comment #2 from whl <2243829852 at qq dot com> --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #1) > $ c++filt _RIMBALO_suB_I__Z5printi > Segmentation fault (core dumped) What do you mean?Have you triggered the bug?If yes, can you provide a l

[Bug binutils/27693] Gprof (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 ,stack overflow occured when call the function "demangle_path"

2021-04-03 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27693 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab --- $ c++filt _RIMBALO_suB_I__Z5printi Segmentation fault (core dumped) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/27693] New: Gprof (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 ,stack overflow occured when call the function "demangle_path"

2021-04-03 Thread 2243829852 at qq dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27693 Bug ID: 27693 Summary: Gprof (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.36.1 ,stack overflow occured when call the function "demangle_path" Product: binutils Version: 2.36.1

[Bug gprof/23056] Multiple memory corruption in gprof (binuitils-2.30-15ubuntu1)

2020-06-03 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23056 --- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Stephen Casner : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=31af1e68af26f5cae209de3530d0455b8a944b2d commit 31af1e68af26f5cae209de353

[Bug gprof/25915] Fail Fake

2020-05-03 Thread harrisbritt6904.0 at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25915 --- Comment #1 from harris britt --- It is solved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug gprof/25915] New: Fail Fake

2020-05-03 Thread harrisbritt6904.0 at gmail dot com
Component: gprof Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: harrisbritt6904.0 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/25830] pdp11-aout target does not support gdb, gdbserver, gprof

2020-04-21 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25830 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug binutils/25830] pdp11-aout target does not support gdb, gdbserver, gprof

2020-04-21 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
11104e4297b33e642bd509a07a3313210a0991aa Author: Stephen Casner Date: Tue Apr 21 10:27:50 2020 +0100 Since the pdp11-aout target does not support gdb, gdbserver or gprof these should be excluded in configure. PR 25830 * configure.ac (noconfigdirs): Exclude gdb & gprof for p

[Bug binutils/25830] pdp11-aout target does not support gdb, gdbserver, gprof

2020-04-17 Thread casner at acm dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25830 --- Comment #4 from Stephen Casner --- Corrected patch request: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2020-April/110709.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/25830] pdp11-aout target does not support gdb, gdbserver, gprof

2020-04-17 Thread casner at acm dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25830 --- Comment #3 from Stephen Casner --- Oops, sorry. I do understand the autotools process, but it has been a few years and I was not paying enough attention so I overlooked it here. I will proceed as you have suggested. -- You are receivin

[Bug binutils/25830] pdp11-aout target does not support gdb, gdbserver, gprof

2020-04-17 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25830 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug binutils/25830] pdp11-aout target does not support gdb, gdbserver, gprof

2020-04-15 Thread casner at acm dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25830 --- Comment #1 from Stephen Casner --- Created attachment 12464 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12464&action=edit Patch for configure Add gdb and gprof to noconfigdirs for pdp11-*-*; gdbserver is handled separa

[Bug binutils/25830] New: pdp11-aout target does not support gdb, gdbserver, gprof

2020-04-15 Thread casner at acm dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25830 Bug ID: 25830 Summary: pdp11-aout target does not support gdb, gdbserver, gprof Product: binutils Version: 2.35 (HEAD) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug gprof/2776] Strange profiling results

2020-01-30 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2776 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gprof/2335] gprof reads executable 10x slower on opteron/x86_64

2020-01-30 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2335 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|

[Bug gprof/25357] Latest Bikes

2020-01-09 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25357 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added URL|https://www.autonews360.com | |/new-bikes/launc

  1   2   3   4   >