Hi Jorma,
OK - I have checked in the attached patch to address your concerns.
Cheers
Nick
gas/ChangeLog
2011-05-18 Nick Clifton
* config/tc-arm.c (s_unreq): Reword warning message to make it
easier to translate.
* config/tc-ia64.c (md_show_usage): Add note for tr
2011/5/17, Nick Clifton :
>> I do not understand this one. Should it be redefine, not undefine ?
>
> Actually no, "undefine" is correct. The message occurs when the user
> has something like this in their assembler source code:
>
>.unreq r1
>
> The ".unreq" pseudo-op is used to remove a regist
Hi Jorma,
I have checked in a patch to fix the typos that you reported. There
were a couple of other questions though:
#: config/tc-arm.c:2401
#, c-format
msgid "ignoring attempt to undefine built-in register '%s'"
I do not understand this one. Should it be redefine, not undefine ?
Actu
Hi,
I found the following typos in the gas-2.20.90.pot file:
#: cond.c:314
#: cond.c:420
msgid "here is the previous \"else\""
Should it be .else here, not else ?
#: cond.c:317
#: cond.c:423
msgid "here is the previous \"if\""
Shoud it be .if here, not if ?
#: cond.c:417
msgid "duplicate \"el
