https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32628
Bug ID: 32628
Summary: in go binaries section .eh_frame called .gopclntab
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32599
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.debian.org/109
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32542
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|amodra at gmail dot com|
--
You are receiving this mail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32599
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32601
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
The backtrace isn't all that useful, but it is very likely to be one of the
bfd_put_64 calls writing out a got entry. You'll need to find out which one.
If I'm correct about it being a got entry, debug unde
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32599
--- Comment #2 from Sourceware Commits ---
The binutils-2_44-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=102df36d9cd1e611c18ae8e258fa633a4949665e
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32601
Bug ID: 32601
Summary: ld on Alpha terminated with double free or corruption
(!prev) and signal 6
Product: binutils
Version: 2.45 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32599
--- Comment #1 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=fd45211245d0f1027a0c3ab606e3253eda779e68
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32599
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32599
Bug ID: 32599
Summary: [2.44 Regression] objcopy -I ihex: invalid operation
Product: binutils
Version: 2.44
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32586
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||riscv32-elf,
|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32586
Bug ID: 32586
Summary: riscv objdump abort
Product: binutils
Version: 2.45 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32467
--- Comment #8 from 孙文举 ---
Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I must apologize for not
thoroughly reviewing the SECURITY.txt document before proceeding. I now
understand that bugs in inspection tools, such as nm, are not considered
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32467
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to 孙文举 from comment #6)
> CVE-2024-57360 assigned
Note - the binutils/SECURITY.txt document makes it clear that bugs in
inspection tools (such as nm) are not considered to be security issues
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32467
--- Comment #6 from 孙文举 ---
CVE-2024-57360 assigned
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32576
--- Comment #1 from 孙文举 ---
**Step to reproduce**
We configured `ld` using
`CFLAGS="-g -fsanitize=address" ./configure --prefix=$(pwd)/ `
and build it using `make -j `, and run it with:
```
./ld -w
--
You are receiving this mail becaus
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32576
Bug ID: 32576
Summary: ld memory leak in xmalloc
Product: binutils
Version: 2.43
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19263
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32542
--- Comment #7 from Tom Tromey ---
I poked at copying it out of gdb a little, but it's probably
easier to just debug BFD in the context of gdb.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
no valgrind reports.
Looking into the core file, I found that this frame in the
stack trace:
#6 0x59de857e in solib_bfd_open (pathname=0x5035b720
"/lib/ld-musl-mips-sf.so.1") at /home/simark/src/binutils-gdb/gdb/solib.c:456
... is somewhat misleading. This file is not
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32542
--- Comment #5 from Alan Modra ---
If this is a bfd problem it ought to be reproducible with objdump, but from
comment #2 I see the file being opened by solib_bfd_open is
"/lib/ld-musl-mips-sf.so.1" and using current binutils I c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32542
Tom Tromey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|gdb |binutils
Version|15.1
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32560
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.44
Status|ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32560
--- Comment #1 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=baac6c221e9d69335bf41366a1c7d87d8ab2f893
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32560
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32560
Bug ID: 32560
Summary: stack-buffer-overflow at objdump disassemble_bytes
(objdump.c:3543:34)
Product: binutils
Version: 2.43
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13298
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |hjl.tools at gmail dot
com
--
Yo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32556
Bug ID: 32556
Summary: nm address points to the zero page
Product: binutils
Version: 2.43
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32555
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra ---
powerpc64 elfv1 is a little weird in that a function symbol is defined on its
procedure descriptor rather than on the code for that function. "D" is correct
in so far as the descriptor is in a data section.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32555
Bug ID: 32555
Summary: nm displays D on functions
Product: binutils
Version: 2.44 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13298
--- Comment #4 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=04cd256685fae4bf54beec1a461298e8fc574890
commit 04cd256685fae4bf54beec1a461298e8fc574890
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13298
--- Comment #3 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9b854f169df9b9853dc7284114beca8d8ab4f99f
commit 9b854f169df9b9853dc7284114beca8d8ab4f99f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32550
Mitch Capper changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mitch.capper at gmail dot com
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32550
--- Comment #1 from Mitch Capper ---
Created attachment 15879
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15879&action=edit
before.lib after running ranlib on it
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32550
Bug ID: 32550
Summary: ranlib manipulation of MSVC ".lib" files can lead to
awkward corruption
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: U
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32531
LIU Hao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lh_mouse at 126 dot com
--- Comment #1 from
leanly on binutils 2.36 and removes
the performance problem that we had on the internal link that was our main
pain-point.
I also know of another team hitting this problem on binutils 2.42.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32459
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 15874
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15874&action=edit
Proposed patch
Hi Maskray,
OK, what do you think of this patch ?
With the patch applied, if you try
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238
--- Comment #20 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a55875bd182258a917af303c653d6667593e7b3e
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238
--- Comment #19 from Matthew Malcomson ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #18)
> Created attachment 15869 [details]
> proposed fix
>
> would someone easily able to test performance of this patch, please try it
> out.
I can confirm that
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32531
Bug ID: 32531
Summary: [GAS] Intel Assembly Bugs (Mishandle Directive Names)
Product: binutils
Version: 2.38
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|binutils|ld
--
You are receiving this mail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
Target Milestone|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32324
--- Comment #6 from Andre Vieira ---
Scrap that, probably best not to backport.
Oh and thank you Alan!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32324
Andre Vieira changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32506
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
For targets where zero is a valid address a linker option to specify an
alternate relocation target for targets within GCed sections might be a
workaround, specifying an address that more likely doesn't c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32506
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
2013.10) ) #2
SMP Thu Nov 14 03:41:21 CST 2024
OS: Debian 11.11
Binutils: 2.35.2
Pagesize: 32768 (getconf PAGESIZE = 32768)
Works:
- ./helloworld-binutils_2.35.2-pagesize_32768
- ./helloworld-binutils_2.35.2-pagesize_32768-lib
- ./helloworld-binutils_2.35.2-pagesize_4096
- ./helloworld
#include
#include
int main()
{
double x = 1.00;
double y = sin(x);
printf("Hello, World!\n%f\n", y);
struct timeval tv;
struct timezone tz;
gettimeofday(&tv,&tz);
printf("Seconds since 1/1/1970: %lu\n",tv.tv_sec);
return 0;
}
EOF
BINUTILS_VER=$(grep -E -A20 &qu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32048
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
Thanks, that's a start. A further useful step would be to build some small C
program which, when built with an arm compiler with bad binutils, breaks when
run under qemu with the page size setting.
It&#
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30033
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32048
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32048
--- Comment #6 from Claudio Luck ---
Related, if not a duplicate of: Bug #30033 (that is for 32bit userspace on
64bit CPU, here we have 32bit userspace on 32bit CPU).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32048
Claudio Luck changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c.luck at datact dot ch
--- Comment #5
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32109
--- Comment #9 from Sourceware Commits ---
The binutils-2_43-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=412919cb962e984e5272435ad6aa4766029954e9
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31595
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7 f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31269
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31379
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238
--- Comment #18 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 15869
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15869&action=edit
proposed fix
would someone easily able to test performance of this patch, please try it out.
--
You are r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32506
--- Comment #2 from Trampas Stern ---
Wow 13415 is from 13 years ago! However I have only noticed int GCC 11 and
newer, but I guess the bug could have been there much longer.
I have not looked at source code but my guess is the linker is pla
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32506
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32507
--- Comment #7 from Sourceware Commits ---
The gdb-16-branch branch has been updated by Eli Zaretskii
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=97078538d6fe6269951dccd5c85f1b979bd356c3
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238
--- Comment #17 from Matthew Malcomson ---
Created attachment 15868
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15868&action=edit
Assembler creates unique names
Option (3) -- assembler creates object-unique names for SHT_GROUP sec
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238
--- Comment #16 from Matthew Malcomson ---
Created attachment 15867
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15867&action=edit
Cache which linked list was last traversed
Option (2) -- caching the head and tail of the linked lis
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238
--- Comment #15 from Matthew Malcomson ---
Created attachment 15866
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15866&action=edit
Re-ordering sections in linked list
Option (1) -- adding second/third/... sections with same name in
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32238
Matthew Malcomson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mmalcomson at nvidia dot com
---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32507
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32507
--- Comment #5 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b38cf91f230bc3892ab9c3deb4f1b6639c657c47
commit
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32507
--- Comment #4 from Eli Zaretskii ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #3)
> Created attachment 15864 [details]
> revised fix
>
> The patch was incomplete.
Thanks, this new patch does solve the problem.
--
You are receiving this mail b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32459
--- Comment #2 from Fangrui Song ---
Hi Nick,
Sorry for my late reply and happy new year!
I favor 1) for its simplicity. I do think it's tricky to share code between
readelf (no BFD dependency) and objdump. It's probably good enough to encou
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32507
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #15863|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32507
--- Comment #2 from Eli Zaretskii ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #1)
> Created attachment 15863 [details]
> proposed fix
>
> Try this
Thanks, I applied the patch (and reverted by kludge in compress.c), but the
problem persists: the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32506
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32506
--- Comment #1 from Trampas Stern ---
Note this issue also has the bug in GCC:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118221
I was told it was not a GCC bug but a binutils bug. However this can be
debated by those who know more than
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32507
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32507
Bug ID: 32507
Summary: Incorrect allocation size printed by 32-bit MinGW
builds of BFD
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32506
Bug ID: 32506
Summary: removed functions showing up in objdump listing and
gdb
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32505
Bug ID: 32505
Summary: Memory leak in objcopy when using --add-gnu-debuglink
option.
Product: binutils
Version: 2.44 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32502
Bug ID: 32502
Summary: stack-overflow in string_append
Product: binutils
Version: 2.43
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19217
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.26
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30919
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30919
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||31885, 31886, 31887, 31888,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30919
--- Comment #3 from Soomin Kim ---
JFYI, Hyungseok and I are working in the same research group. So, please don't
be confused if the authors of the issues are different from me.
Thank you.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30919
Hyungseok Kim changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||witbring at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30596
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sam at gentoo dot org
--
You are receivi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30919
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Can you file these as individual bugs please?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32324
--- Comment #4 from Sourceware Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=bbc969306f8d5fb6c7b636e25f6f8e278946ef23
commit
...@developer.gserviceaccount.com added comment #5:
The latest build has succeeded, closing this issue.
___
Reference Info: 380409703 binutils: Coverage build failure
component: Public Trackers > 1362134 > OSS Fuzz
status: Verified
reporter: 87...@developer.gserviceaccou
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32493
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #5)
>
> I spent some time until I figured out the problem was in binutils but then
> ran out of time which is why I filed the bug report first.
(
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32493
--- Comment #5 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #1)
> Please provide at least a .config which can reproduce it, as well as a good
> and bad modpost binary (with only binutils version differing b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32493
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|--- |2.32
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Fixed in binutils 2.32 by
commit d3def5d73eb9d8295ca7b11d130b17a815151951
Author: Masatake Yamato
Date: Wed Nov 7 18:07:36 2018 +
Enhance objdump's --disassemble switch so
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32493
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Dup of PR 32435?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32493
--- Comment #2 from Sam James ---
I can try get those elements tonight but I can't promise as I've got other bits
on TODO for this evening.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32493
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Please provide at least a .config which can reproduce it, as well as a good and
bad modpost binary (with only binutils version differing between them).
Preprocessed source for modpost would be great as well
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32493
Bug ID: 32493
Summary: Binutils 2.44 results in unaligned code on
linux-sparc64
Product: binutils
Version: 2.44 (HEAD)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
1 - 100 of 9297 matches
Mail list logo
