Mathias Svensson writes:
> In multiple places in opcodes/arm-dis.c there is an implcit assumption
> that bfd_vma has the same size as an int. See for example lines
> 2014-2033 in HEAD.
You are looking at some one year old sources, this has already been
fixed in 2012-07, in response to PR binutil
Hi Mathias,
In multiple places in opcodes/arm-dis.c there is an implcit assumption
that bfd_vma has the same size as an int. See for example lines
2014-2033 in HEAD.
This can cause a segfault e.g. if binutils is compiled on i386 with
--enable-64-bit-bfd --target=arm-linux.
I am confused - how
Hello,
In multiple places in opcodes/arm-dis.c there is an implcit assumption
that bfd_vma has the same size as an int. See for example lines
2014-2033 in HEAD.
This can cause a segfault e.g. if binutils is compiled on i386 with
--enable-64-bit-bfd --target=arm-linux.
I have attached a patch, th
