--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2008-09-16
04:35 ---
You cannot define _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ like this in a script.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From jmorrison at printronix dot com 2008-08-20
22:26 ---
Reply to #10:
Item 1: here is the updated linker script with the .eh_frame "clause" (near the
end). I still get the
no memory region specified for loadable section `.eh_frame'
error message.
STARTUP(
--- Additional Comments From jmorrison at printronix dot com 2008-08-20
18:33 ---
Reply to #10:
Item 1. I'll play around so more with the linker script.
Item 2. Here is the information you asked for (i hope):
I've edited out my mistakes...
For brevity I change "/home/morr_jo/work/To
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-08-20 11:17
---
Hi John,
Hmm, without a test case this is going to be very hard to track down and fix.
But if you are willing to try a few things then maybe we can solve it.
1. Re comment #8. If you add an entry for .eh_f
--- Additional Comments From jmorrison at printronix dot com 2008-08-15
16:17 ---
Reply to #7 from Nick.
That was a finger-check on my part. We started this journey with 2.17, but
once we ran across the seg-fault, we went to 2.18 and I've been continuously
checking with the latest s
--- Additional Comments From jmorrison at printronix dot com 2008-08-15
16:15 ---
Reply to #6 from Alan:
Without the --gc-section option I get this error message:
no memory region specified for loadable section `.eh_frame'
You can see our linker script in one of the console listing
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2008-08-15 11:02
---
Subject: Re: New: Segmentation Fault using cross architecture
ld command
Hi John,
> We are upgrading our cross-compiler from GCC 2.95.2, binutils 2.10.1 to GCC
> 4.2.0, binutils 2.17.
Is there any partic
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6844
--- You are receiving this mail because: -
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2008-08-15
00:41 ---
Does your project link if you omit --gc-sections from the ld options?
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6844
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list
--- Additional Comments From jmorrison at printronix dot com 2008-08-14
22:39 ---
The GDB Console Listing attachment shows the parameters on the command call.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6844
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the C
--- Additional Comments From jmorrison at printronix dot com 2008-08-14
22:37 ---
I have not been really able to cut the execution down to a reasonale test
size. I wish I could.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6844
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
--- Additional Comments From jmorrison at printronix dot com 2008-08-14
22:36 ---
Created an attachment (id=2907)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2907&action=view)
The file created with the -M flag
Just in case you may have wanted it.
--
http://sourceware.org/
--- Additional Comments From jmorrison at printronix dot com 2008-08-14
22:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=2906)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2906&action=view)
Full execution console listing while under GDB.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?i
--- Additional Comments From jmorrison at printronix dot com 2008-08-14
22:34 ---
Created an attachment (id=2905)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2905&action=view)
This is trace information from GDB.
Let me know if you want more information and how to get it for y
14 matches
Mail list logo
