--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-11-29 08:17
---
Hi Martin,
I have applied the patch to the 2.18 branch and HEAD.
Cheers
Nick
bfd/ChangeLog
2007-11-29 Nick Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR ld/5398
* elf32-arm.c (bfd_elf32_arm_process_befor
--- Additional Comments From tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-11-28 16:52 ---
Nick,
Thanks for looking at this issue. Your patch works for me. The assertion
is gone and the test suite doesn't have any new failures. Can you put this
into HEAD and the 2.18 branch please?
--
What
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-11-28 13:30
---
Hi Martin,
It appears that the assertion was being a little bit overzealous. Please
could you try out the uploaded patch and let me know if it works for you.
Cheers
Nick
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-11-28 13:29
---
Created an attachment (id=2114)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2114&action=view)
Remove bogus assertion and instead exit function cleanly if there is no glue
bfd
--
http://sourceware.or
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC target triplet||arm-linux-gnu
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5398
--- You are receiving this mail because
--- Additional Comments From tbm at cyrius dot com 2007-11-24 19:02 ---
Created an attachment (id=2107)
--> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2107&action=view)
libm ARM Debian
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5398
--- You are receiving this mail
