[Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC

2007-08-09 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-08-09 11:37 --- http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-08/msg00055.html applied to 2.18 branch too. -- What|Removed |Added -

[Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC

2007-08-08 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
-- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2007-08-08 22:28:07 |2007-08-08 22:28:53 date|

[Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC

2007-08-08 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |amodra at bigpond dot net |redhat dot com |dot au Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC

2007-08-08 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
-- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2007-08-08 22:28:07 date|

[Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC

2007-08-07 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-08-07 23:54 --- typo.. i486-linuxaout. i486-linux-aout is the same as i486-aout. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4515 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list f

[Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC

2007-08-07 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-08-07 23:06 --- Oops. Indeed, i486-linux-aout has this problem. Both Nick and I checked i486-aout, assuming that it was the same target as i486-linux-aout. -- What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC

2007-08-07 Thread Quentin dot Godfroy at ens dot fr
--- Additional Comments From Quentin dot Godfroy at ens dot fr 2007-08-07 18:35 --- In binutils 2.17 sources, What I see in emulparams/i386linux.sh is : >OUTPUT_FORMAT="a.out-i386-linux" >TARGET_PAGE_SIZE=0x1000 >TEXT_START_ADDR=0x1020 >NONPAGED_TEXT_START_ADDR=0 >... and in genscripts

[Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC

2007-08-06 Thread amodra at bigpond dot net dot au
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2007-08-07 01:27 --- As Nick says, current x86-aout scripts have . = 0. -- What|Removed |Added Stat

[Bug ld/4515] bad definition of start address in ldscripts for OMAGIC

2007-05-24 Thread nickc at redhat dot com
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2007-05-24 11:50 --- Hi Quentin, > When making OMAGIC executables with ld with the swich -N, the ld script begins > with : > >> SECTIONS >> { >> . = 0x1020; It does ? The version I have locally starts with ". = 0". > It seems t