https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33199
--- Comment #14 from Indu Bhagat ---
(In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #12)
> Has anyone tried to register OS independent values for the sframe section
> and segment types?
No yet. There are some unknowns - Do all platforms use progra
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33199
--- Comment #13 from Rainer Orth ---
> --- Comment #10 from Indu Bhagat ---
> To be clear, the current SEGV is because we do a sframe_plt = NULL if
> !normal_target in bfd/elfxx-x86.c _bfd_x86_elf_link_setup_gnu_properties. We
> could go ahe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33199
--- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab ---
Has anyone tried to register OS independent values for the sframe section and
segment types?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33199
--- Comment #11 from Rainer Orth ---
> --- Comment #10 from Indu Bhagat ---
> (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #9)
[...]
>> true, but why would this be necessary, especially when gcc is using both
>> gas and gld? This combo should be ab
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33199
--- Comment #10 from Indu Bhagat ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #9)
> > --- Comment #8 from Indu Bhagat ---
> > Recently to fix PR ld/33146, commit 939eb467b21de5d18ee703755fb9704a525cfe21
> > added some tests to be run with --gsfr
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33199
--- Comment #9 from Rainer Orth ---
> --- Comment #8 from Indu Bhagat ---
> Recently to fix PR ld/33146, commit 939eb467b21de5d18ee703755fb9704a525cfe21
> added some tests to be run with --gsframe. SFrame sections are of type
> SHT_GNU_SFRAM
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33199
--- Comment #8 from Indu Bhagat ---
Recently to fix PR ld/33146, commit 939eb467b21de5d18ee703755fb9704a525cfe21
added some tests to be run with --gsframe. SFrame sections are of type
SHT_GNU_SFRAME, a new section type added for GNU/Linux. Di
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33199
--- Comment #7 from Indu Bhagat ---
Its weird indeed. I cannot ping it still, but I can ssh into it today...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33199
--- Comment #6 from Rainer Orth ---
> --- Comment #5 from Indu Bhagat ---
> Thanks! Will try this out on cfarm 215 once it back online (it has been down
> the whole day today).
This is weird: the system has been up all day yesterday, and the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33199
--- Comment #5 from Indu Bhagat ---
Thanks! Will try this out on cfarm 215 once it back online (it has been down
the whole day today).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33199
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ---
> --- Comment #1 from Indu Bhagat ---
> On a cfarm 215, when running the ld testsuite, I see that the lto.exp tests
> are
> not run. Not sure if I need a gcc with lto enabled (will look).
>
> Further man
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33199
--- Comment #3 from Indu Bhagat ---
Ugh, the error is crippling in many ways:
built in linker script:0: syntax error
Any inputs appreciated.
$ ld -shared sort.o bubble_sort.o -o temp.so
ld:built in linker script:0: syntax error
$ ld -V
GNU l
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33199
--- Comment #2 from Indu Bhagat ---
Nevermind. If I feed the linker script manually using -T, I think I can
reproduce this using a toy binaries. But the linker script error in testsuite
is still wierd to see..
--
You are receiving this mail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33199
--- Comment #1 from Indu Bhagat ---
On a cfarm 215, when running the ld testsuite, I see that the lto.exp tests are
not run. Not sure if I need a gcc with lto enabled (will look).
Further many of the ld tests fail (also the same failure whe
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33199
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||indu.bhagat at oracle dot com,
15 matches
Mail list logo
