https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32671
Bug 32671 depends on bug 32717, which changed state.
Bug 32717 Summary: glibc tests fail when bfd is built with
--enable-error-execstack=yes
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32717
What|Removed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32671
--- Comment #7 from Aurelien Jarno ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #6)
> (In reply to Aurelien Jarno from comment #5)
> > I am not fully convince that we want to default to
> > --enable-error-execstack=yes at this stage. It seems
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32671
Bug 32671 depends on bug 32715, which changed state.
Bug 32715 Summary: ld-elf/elf.exp fails, when configured with
--disable-default-execstack --enable-warn-rwx-segments
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32715
What
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32671
Florian Weimer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fw at deneb dot enyo.de
--- Comment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32671
Aurelien Jarno changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aurelien at aurel32 dot net
--- Comm
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32671
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||32717
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourcewa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32671
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||32715
Referenced Bugs:
https://sourcewa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32671
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton ---
I have no objections to changing the linker's default behaviour - as long as
the choice can be overridden by a configure time option so that distributions
that want the old behaviour can still obtain it.
-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32671
Frederik Schwan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||freswa at archlinux dot org
--
You
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32671
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
I think that's the pragmatic approach. We could go further but I think the
gains probably aren't worth it (at least for quite some time).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32671
--- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer ---
Maybe error only if the lack of executable stack markup is due to the lack of
markup in any of the inputs, as opposed to an explicit request for an
executable stack?
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32671
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
I don't mind working on this but I'd like consensus first.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
12 matches
Mail list logo