[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-02-13 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receivi

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-02-13 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-02-06 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 --- Comment #18 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=73ab3b9825d232f0f3a4ad811e88697f9b9ab162 commit 73ab3b9825d232f0f3a4ad811e88697f9b9ab162 A

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-02-04 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu --- (

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-02-04 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 --- Comment #16 from Jan Beulich --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15) > (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #14) > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13) > > > I created a testcase which generates a linker error > > > > > > failed t

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-02-03 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 --- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #14) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #13) > > I created a testcase which generates a linker error > > > > failed to convert GOTPCREL relocation against '__stack_chk_gu

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-02-03 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 Jan Beulich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #14 from Jan Beulich -

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-31 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu --- I created a testcase which generates a linker error failed to convert GOTPCREL relocation against '__stack_chk_guard'; relink with --no-relax similar to https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #11) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10) > > Please try it on Xen. > > I don't see why I would put time into doing so. As previously indicated, Xen > expects .got to

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-30 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 --- Comment #11 from Jan Beulich --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10) > Please try it on Xen. I don't see why I would put time into doing so. As previously indicated, Xen expects .got to be empty. I don't see how that could be achieved

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- (

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-30 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 --- Comment #9 from Jan Beulich --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > My patch doesn't support fallback which is very intrusive with few benefits. Well, as said in the original report, in the Xen project it's the fallback we'd really ne

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-30 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #7) > You say "estimate", and since you exclude linker created sections it looks > like it very much is just an estimate. While for the specific case of Xen > this may be su

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-30 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 --- Comment #7 from Jan Beulich --- You say "estimate", and since you exclude linker created sections it looks like it very much is just an estimate. While for the specific case of Xen this may be sufficient (see below though), in the general

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #15905|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-29 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #15896|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-26 Thread i at maskray dot me
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i at maskray dot me --- Comment #4 fro

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 15896 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15896&action=edit A patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-26 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW -- You are receiving this mail because

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-24 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > Is it possible to create a small testcase? Never mind. We can add a linker option, -z no-relax=symbol, to disable linker relaxation for symbol. This option can be used

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-24 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Is

[Bug ld/32591] undue GOTPCREL relaxation attempts

2025-01-24 Thread jbeulich at suse dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32591 Jan Beulich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com