https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30004
--- Comment #6 from Pali Rohár ---
Hm... When I'm thinking about it, DLL library without export table does not
make sense (or yes?). So maybe condition for generating export table when there
is no exported symbol should have been based on the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30004
--- Comment #5 from Pali Rohár ---
Thanks!
Anyway, the whole issue is about executables, not libraries. So I still do not
understand reasons.
And I'm not quite sure what it is "position independent DLL". Every DLL library
should contain relo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30004
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30004
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c9802aca6d152c4a47252f69ad81556dbc24e312
commit c9802aca6d152c4a47252f69ad8
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30004
--- Comment #2 from Pali Rohár ---
Hello! Sorry for a longer delay. Now I did tests with your proposed patch and
export table and .edata section is not generated anymore.
But there is one thing which I do not understand: Why when bfd_link_pic
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30004
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
Assi
