[Bug ld/27050] [2.36 Regression] ld -no-pie not recognized anymore

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050 Martin Liska changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mliska at suse dot cz -- You are rece

[Bug ld/27050] [2.36 Regression] ld -no-pie not recognized anymore

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ld/27050] [2.36 Regression] ld -no-pie not recognized anymore

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050 --- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=3991c7acb29aa8d7d52150695eb3efa03a08dd50 commit 3991c7acb29aa8d7d52150695eb

[Bug ld/27050] [2.36 Regression] ld -no-pie not recognized anymore

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050 --- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab --- That's the *compiler* flag. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/27050] [2.36 Regression] ld -no-pie not recognized anymore

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Klose --- that was reported for qemu: ./configure:# Check we support --no-pie first; we will need this for building ROMs. ./configure:if compile_prog "-Werror -fno-pie" "-no-pie"; then ./configure: LDFLAGS_NOPIE=

[Bug ld/27050] [2.36 Regression] ld -no-pie not recognized anymore

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #5) > Not to be facetious but did we ever really support -no-pie ? > ld/testsuite/config/default.exp: set NOPIE_LDFLAGS "-no-pie" -- You are receiving this mail beca

[Bug ld/27050] [2.36 Regression] ld -no-pie not recognized anymore

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug ld/27050] [2.36 Regression] ld -no-pie not recognized anymore

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- LONGIND returns the index in LONGOPT of the long-named option found. It is only valid when a long-named option has been found by the most recent call. Since the long option isn't found, LONGIND is unde

[Bug ld/27050] [2.36 Regression] ld -no-pie not recognized anymore

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- longind may not be set by getopt_long_only: diff --git a/ld/lexsup.c b/ld/lexsup.c index 0d10bc6fba..60e3f7d8b5 100644 --- a/ld/lexsup.c +++ b/ld/lexsup.c @@ -735,6 +735,7 @@ parse_args (unsigned argc, char **a

[Bug ld/27050] [2.36 Regression] ld -no-pie not recognized anymore

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- $ valgrind ./ld/ld-new -no-pie ==290969== Memcheck, a memory error detector ==290969== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==290969== Using Valgrind-3.16.1 and LibVEX; rerun with -h f

[Bug ld/27050] [2.36 Regression] ld -no-pie not recognized anymore

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Target Milestone|---

[Bug ld/27050] [2.36 Regression] ld -no-pie not recognized anymore

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27050 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC|