https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26806
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26806
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #13)
> FYI: Two new rawhide bugs have been filed since I updated the binutils with
> the patch for this PR:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893404
> http
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26806
--- Comment #13 from Nick Clifton ---
FYI: Two new rawhide bugs have been filed since I updated the binutils with the
patch for this PR:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893404
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1893734
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26806
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26806
--- Comment #11 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=b1a92c635c1ec10fd703302ce1fc4ab3a8515a04
commit b1a92c635c1ec10fd703302ce1fc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26806
--- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #8)
> Please show it to be broken it if you can!
I doubt that I could do that myself. But for what it is worth I have applied
your patch to the latest Fedora rawhide
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26806
--- Comment #9 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 12932
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12932&action=edit
testcases
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26806
--- Comment #8 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 12931
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12931&action=edit
patch under test
This should do what I intended for git commit 1e3b96fd6cf. Please show it to
be broken it
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26806
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #6)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > This regression was introduced on purpose by
> That's not exactly true. The as-needed library was supposed to marked
> needed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26806
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|ASSIGNED
--
You are receiving this mail
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26806
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26806
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Alan Modra from comment #4)
>
> So this whole thing is a bit of a mess. Reverting my patches and applying
> HJ's might work as a quick solution, but do please check out Jeff's testcase.
Jeff's tes
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26806
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--
You are receiv
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26806
--- Comment #4 from Alan Modra ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #2)
> I am hoping that Alan will review the patch, but just FYI it is working for
> me in rawhide.
There is an email thread on that subject. I committed a couple of pat
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26806
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
The patch was posted at
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2020-September/113227.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26806
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26806
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
Status|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26806
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
18 matches
Mail list logo
