https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26590
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26590
--- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=93d49941edbb5274bee6ce3e547a07c7ce4c4301
commit 93d49941edbb5274bee6ce3e547a07c7
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26590
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Your testcase demonstrates --as-needed working as designed. This is not a bug
in ld.bfd and the fact that gold does not diagnose an undefined symbol does not
mean much.
--
You are receiving this mail becau
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26590
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Both gold and lld generate output. But
[hjl@gnu-cfl-2 pr26530a]$ ./x
1
[hjl@gnu-cfl-2 pr26530a]$ LD_BIND_NOW=1 ./x
./x: symbol lookup error: ./liblto-18c.so: undefined symbol: f1
[hjl@gnu-cfl-2 pr26530a]$
I t
