https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
--- Comment #15 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=64b59b6bb2261fe2fa8310f94b4ed420c162e357
commit 64b59b6bb2261fe2fa8310f94b4ed42
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
--- Comment #14 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The try-PR26391 branch has been updated by Mark Wielaard :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=99175c84026b1bfa534f3946150535c39027911d
commit 99175c84026b1bfa534f
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sam at gentoo dot org
--
You are receivi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 13877
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13877&action=edit
sparc64-linux binaries
I built sparc64-linux pr26391-5 and pr26391-6 binaries with a cross
compiler on Linux/x
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
I don't know why "ld -r -z unique-symbol" generates incorrect output
on sparc64.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
--- Comment #11 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #10)
> It seems that this test is failing on sparc64:
>
> FAIL: Run pr26391-5
> FAIL: Run pr26391-6
>
> See:
> https://buildd.debian.org/s
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glaubitz at physik dot
fu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
--- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1f656a652ea8d489b5aa5b7f55c535fc9e6b0b29
commit 1f656a652ea8d489b5aa5b7f55c53
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
--- Comment #7 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c475664f2b73bd
commit 496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c47566
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |2.36
URL|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
--- Comment #5 from Kristen Carlson Accardi ---
https://lore.kernel.org/live-patching/4dc070f53f4f96b47dba4e4e51bb65d75f2071bb.ca...@linux.intel.com/T/#mb29f61d93a1f0307212053c90ab86cb9fe5a64ee
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
--- Comment #4 from Kristen Carlson Accardi ---
This feature was well received by the livepatch maintainers. It not only solves
my individual problem, but also would allow them to more precisely locate
duplicate symbols in general for patching
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
I updated my branch to rename the option name to "-z unique-symbol".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
--- Comment #2 from Kristen Carlson Accardi ---
This works for me! Thanks!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Please try
https://gitlab.com/x86-binutils/binutils-gdb/-/tree/users/hjl/pr26391/master
You can pass -z unique to ld to make local symbols unique.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC li
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26391
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
18 matches
Mail list logo