https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #28 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=2219ae0b0ebe14373850b000c2abaa31dab1d741
commit 2219ae0b0ebe14373850b000c2abaa3
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #29 from Frediano Ziglio ---
Wonderful!
Some question:
- why not adding a test based on the code from Martin?
- is this fix not similar to a previous issue (PR 23958, PR 23818, PR 23309, PR
22983, PR 22751, PR 22502, PR 0, PR
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #27 from Frediano Ziglio ---
I compiled 2.32 version with the patch provided under Fedora 29 and the initial
issue disappeared.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #26 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #25)
> Created attachment 11681 [details]
> A patch
>
> Please try this.
Good job H.J. I can confirm it works for a simple test-case and I see:
737 54db81cc670131ad PREV
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 11681
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11681&action=edit
A patch
Please try this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Version|unspecified
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #24 from Frediano Ziglio ---
Just update binutils on Fedora 29 to 2.32 and compiled the small program at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81879, still crash,
wine: Unhandled page fault on execute access to 0x a
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #23 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #22)
> Works for me with binutils 2.32:
>
Have you tried to run the binary with wine?
You'll probably see something like:
wine: Unhandled page fault on read access to 0x
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu ---
Works for me with binutils 2.32:
[hjl@gnu-cfl-2 pr24267]$ cat x.ii
namespace std {
template struct char_traits;
template > class basic_ostream;
typedef basic_ostream b;
class ios_base {
public:
class Init
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #21 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #20)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #19)
> > H.J. : Can you please help me how to find a place which makes a real
> > decision about which BFD (object) will be u
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #20 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #19)
> H.J. : Can you please help me how to find a place which makes a real
> decision about which BFD (object) will be used for each symbol?
Is there a way to easily rep
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #19 from Martin Liška ---
H.J. : Can you please help me how to find a place which makes a real decision
about which BFD (object) will be used for each symbol?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #18 from Martin Liška ---
> I meant it must be PREVAILING_DEF and can't be PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY.
Yes, PREVAILING_DEF would be fine as well for COFF.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #16)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #15)
> > Yes, both return:
> >
> > ...
> > 262 545ca41eb4de6c9c PREVAILING_DEF _ZNKSt5ctypeIcE8do_widenEc
>
> Since it is refere
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #15)
> Yes, both return:
>
> ...
> 262 545ca41eb4de6c9c PREVAILING_DEF _ZNKSt5ctypeIcE8do_widenEc
Since it is referenced from istream-inst.o, it must be
_ZNKSt5ctypeIcE8
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #15 from Martin Liška ---
Yes, both return:
...
262 545ca41eb4de6c9c PREVAILING_DEF _ZNKSt5ctypeIcE8do_widenEc
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #13)
> >
> > What do ELF linkers (gold and bfd) get?
>
> We get:
>
> (gdb) p owner_sec->owner->filename
> $5 = 0x69ae80 "main.o (symbol from plugin)"
Do gold and bfd g
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
>
> What do ELF linkers (gold and bfd) get?
We get:
(gdb) p owner_sec->owner->filename
$5 = 0x69ae80 "main.o (symbol from plugin)"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #11)
> I've got a patch candidate that can solve it:
>
> diff --git a/bfd/coffgen.c b/bfd/coffgen.c
> index 309e1249ac..1d200b066b 100644
> --- a/bfd/coffgen.c
> +++ b/bf
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
I've got a patch candidate that can solve it:
diff --git a/bfd/coffgen.c b/bfd/coffgen.c
index 309e1249ac..1d200b066b 100644
--- a/bfd/coffgen.c
+++ b/bfd/coffgen.c
@@ -2678,9 +2678,9 @@ _bfd_coff_section
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #10 from Martin Liška ---
> I don't understand much the details but I think what H.J. Lu was trying to
> say is that maybe was fixed for ELF but not for PE/COFF so to have a look at
> the mentioned PRs.
> I cannot suggest any of th
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
Frediano Ziglio changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||freddy77 at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eliz at gnu dot org
--
You are receiv
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eliz at gnu dot org
--
You are receiv
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> > >
> > > Not regression. They are LTO bug fixes.
> >
> > Can you be please more concrete?
>
> Check PR 23958, PR 238
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
hp at tmm dot cx changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at tmm dot cx
--
You are recei
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> >
> > Not regression. They are LTO bug fixes.
>
> Can you be please more concrete?
Check PR 23958, PR 23818, PR 23309, PR 22983, PR 22751, PR 22502,
PR 0, PR
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dave.korn.cygwin at gmail dot
com,
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > > > Does it happen on Linux?
> >
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > > Does it happen on Linux?
> >
> > No, it's specific to w64-mingw32 target.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > Does it happen on Linux?
>
> No, it's specific to w64-mingw32 target. I'm testing that on Linux where I
> use cross compile
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--
You are rece
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> Does it happen on Linux?
No, it's specific to w64-mingw32 target. I'm testing that on Linux where I use
cross compiler + wine:
$ wine --version
wine-4.1
--
You ar
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24267
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ld discard a symbol with|ld discards a symbol with
36 matches
Mail list logo
