https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sam at gentoo dot org
--
You are receivi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
--- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=95e96e052ab2d7781a9dc7267123f49c7b1dd671
commit 95e96e052ab2d7781a9dc726712
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
Jeremi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeremip11 at gmail dot com
--
You are recei
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
--- Comment #8 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=823143c6ca8ef4267e67ba03771991e08d09fabd
commit 823143c6ca8ef4267e67ba03771991e0
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
Frediano Ziglio changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|freddy77 at gmail dot com |
--
You are receiving this
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
Frediano Ziglio changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Invalid entry point used|__start_SCN symbols aren't
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #10353|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
--- Comment #11 from Michael Matz ---
So I think in addition to what my patch did the following also needs solving:
* if a __start symbol is supposed to be created, then it should be created!
(i.e. not merely use some random other symbol com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
--- Comment #10 from Michael Matz ---
Created attachment 10356
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10356&action=edit
another testcase showing unpatched binutils broken
Like with this new testcase. The difference
is that w
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
--- Comment #9 from Michael Matz ---
(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #8)
> Looking at this, that ld-gc/pr20002 doesn't fail without the patch from
> comment #4 is a nice thing, but I think it succeeds for the wrong reasons.
The testca
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
--- Comment #8 from Michael Matz ---
You mean it shows an additional issue, I wasn't saying my patch is perfect,
merely that it fixes my reported problem. I think it's the same reason of why
the testcase ld-gc/pr20022 fails with the proposed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 10355
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10355&action=edit
A testcase to show the issue
With the proposed change, I got
[hjl@gnu-6 orphan-2]$ make
cc -g -c -o app.o ap
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
--- Comment #6 from Michael Matz ---
Created attachment 10354
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10354&action=edit
tarball with testcase
Here is one. Unlike libqb it's not using dl_iterate_phdr and then dlopen with
the k
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #4)
> Created attachment 10353 [details]
> Tentative patch
>
> Well, the problem is quite obvious. Just compile this:
>
> % cat t.c
> #include
> extern void * __start__
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
--- Comment #4 from Michael Matz ---
Created attachment 10353
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10353&action=edit
Tentative patch
Well, the problem is quite obvious. Just compile this:
% cat t.c
#include
extern void *
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #2)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > What should happen when there is _verbose section in more than one shared
> > object?
>
> As I said, the code in question u
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
--- Comment #2 from Michael Matz ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> What should happen when there is _verbose section in more than one shared
> object?
As I said, the code in question uses dlsym, so nothing interesting happens,
multi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #0)
> Commit cbd0eecf reworked the provision of __start_ and __stop_ symbols for
> sections with C-representable names (e.g. to always provide them, not only
> for orphaned
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21964
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com,
21 matches
Mail list logo
