https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20830
Jeremi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeremip11 at gmail dot com
--
You are recei
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20830
dongkyun.s at samsung dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dongkyun.s at samsung d
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20830
--- Comment #11 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The binutils-2_28-branch branch has been updated by H.J. Lu
:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=326e3a04a5fa4fbf85b4cc4188a355d2715e5d17
commit 326e3a04a5fa4fbf8
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20830
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20830
--- Comment #9 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=fff53daefb7838b5718422c87946330e4a8288ce
commit fff53daefb7838b5718422c87946330e
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20830
--- Comment #8 from Keno Fischer ---
Bump on this. I would still very much like to see this applied.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mai
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20830
--- Comment #7 from Keno Fischer ---
In an idealized world, yes, we could assume a default unwind rule if none is
found, but in the real world, it is safer to just terminate the unwind when no
unwind info is present (because more often than no
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20830
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
There are codes which don't need unwind info, similar to .plt.got.
Can unwind library assume DW_CFA_nop if there is no unwind info
so that we only need to generate unwind info only when it isn't
DW_CFA_nop?
--
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20830
--- Comment #5 from Keno Fischer ---
It causes runtime failures in exactly the same cases as missing `.plt` info
would:
Asynchronous unwinds that happen to originate in .plt stubs. This bug was filed
as a result of me working through all the c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20830
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Keno Fischer from comment #3)
> Apologies for the delay. The patch works for me and fixes the cases I saw.
I have no plan to apply this patch unless it changes run-time behavior
with a testcase.
-
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20830
--- Comment #3 from Keno Fischer ---
Apologies for the delay. The patch works for me and fixes the cases I saw.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-b
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20830
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> Created attachment 9640 [details]
> A patch
>
> Please try this.
This patch isn't necessary unless it shows a difference in run-time behavior.
--
You are receiving thi
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20830
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 9640
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9640&action=edit
A patch
Please try this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
__
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20830
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--
You are rece
14 matches
Mail list logo
