[Bug ld/20360] DT_TEXTREL appearing in output with no textrels on x86_64

2023-07-30 Thread sam at gentoo dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20360 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receivi

[Bug ld/20360] DT_TEXTREL appearing in output with no textrels on x86_64

2016-07-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20360 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- Please provide the smallest set of linker inputs which can reproduce the problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug

[Bug ld/20360] DT_TEXTREL appearing in output with no textrels on x86_64

2016-07-12 Thread danglingpointer at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20360 --- Comment #8 from Peter Jas --- Here is the corresponding linker command (without -BSymbolic* , when I ran clang++ command with -v in coreclr/bin/obj/Linux.x64.Debug/src/dlls/mscoree/coreclr directory): "/usr/bin/ld" -z now -z relro --hash-

[Bug ld/20360] DT_TEXTREL appearing in output with no textrels on x86_64

2016-07-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20360 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- I need the linker input so that I can reproduce the linker output. Binary inputs are OK. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug ld/20360] DT_TEXTREL appearing in output with no textrels on x86_64

2016-07-12 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20360 --- Comment #6 from Rich Felker --- To add some context, I suggested building without -Bsymbolic* in case the cause was relocations that would be textrels before -Bsymbolic* optimized them out. Looking at the source, particularly calls/jmps to

[Bug ld/20360] DT_TEXTREL appearing in output with no textrels on x86_64

2016-07-12 Thread danglingpointer at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20360 --- Comment #5 from Peter Jas --- Thanks Rich. I am not the dotnet folk per-se; just contributed some port related PR to the coreclr repo and such. Should we ping someone on the GitHub issue if more information is required? I have uploaded tw

[Bug ld/20360] DT_TEXTREL appearing in output with no textrels on x86_64

2016-07-12 Thread danglingpointer at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20360 --- Comment #4 from Peter Jas --- Created attachment 9386 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9386&action=edit "readelf -aW libcoreclr.so" dump (without -XLinker -BSymbolic -XLinker -BSymbolic-functions) readelf output of

[Bug ld/20360] DT_TEXTREL appearing in output with no textrels on x86_64

2016-07-12 Thread bugdal at aerifal dot cx
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20360 --- Comment #3 from Rich Felker --- At this point there's no testcase smaller than the dotnet/coreclr build, but I wanted to go ahead and post the bug here to get discussion moved to the tracker where it's relevant. I believe they have a way t

[Bug ld/20360] DT_TEXTREL appearing in output with no textrels on x86_64

2016-07-12 Thread danglingpointer at live dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20360 Peter Jas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglingpointer at live dot com --- Comme

[Bug ld/20360] DT_TEXTREL appearing in output with no textrels on x86_64

2016-07-12 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20360 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|